UK Politics

3318 readers

70 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

UK to deny citizenship to small boat refugees (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 1 week ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New guidance states that anyone who enters the UK illegally having made a dangerous journey, which could be via boat, but also by means such as hiding in a vehicle, will normally be refused citizenship, regardless of the time that has passed.

In a statement, the Home Office said the strengthened measures made it clear that anyone who entered the UK illegally would face having a British citizenship application refused.

But, the change has been condemned by the Refugee Council and some Labour MPs - including Stella Creasy who said the change "meant refugees would forever remain second class citizens".

Changes, first disclosed by the Free Movement blog, were introduced to guidance for visa and immigration staff on Monday.

Described as a "clarification" to case worker guidance when assessing if a claimant is of "good character', it says: "Any person applying for citizenship from 10 February 2025, who previously entered the UK illegally will normally be refused, regardless of the time that has passed since the illegal entry took place."

Another new entry to the same guidance says: "A person who applies for citizenship from 10 February 2025 who has previously arrived without a required valid entry clearance or electronic travel authorisation, having made a dangerous journey will normally be refused citizenship.

"A dangerous journey includes, but is not limited to, travelling by small boat or concealed in a vehicle or other conveyance."

Previously, refugees who had arrived by irregular routes would need to wait ten years before being considered.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago

FFS nobody is walking off a boat and being given citizenship...ever!

First they'd have to be given permission to stay short term. Then indefinite permission to stay (which is normally linked to work status). Then after a decade they can apply for citizenship. Before citizenship, they can't claim benefits and can need to make payments to qualify for NHS care.

...including Stella Creasy who said the change "meant refugees would forever remain second class citizens".

No, they would never be able to become citizens. Her point has merit, but she needs to use the correct terms. Refugees are not citizens, because when they get citizenship they have a new home and are no longer refugees.

The language matters. There's a narrative that we are a soft touch because people land on our shores and immediately get all the benefit of being British. It's weaponised lies that need to be shown to be lies. Calling these people citizens feeds the lie.