this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
340 points (96.2% liked)

Academia

868 readers
20 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 51 points 2 months ago (3 children)

it's the branding.

mastodon has a crummy name

but also there's too much friction to get on it

feels an awful lot like bluesky saw where mastodon fell short and decided to be all the things mastodon failed to live up to, but to also be its own set of things that are worse than mastodon on a moral/ethical/technical backend level--but instead they focused on the user experience.

It sucks, but people just enjoy bluesky's user experience more.

If mastodon doesn't like it, mastodon can change. So, go ahead, mastodon. Fix yourself. Be better. We're all waiting.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So, go ahead, mastodon. Fix yourself. Be better. We're all waiting.

"wontfix"

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

And that's why bluesky has won (at least for now).

[–] TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago

X and Bluesky are tools, nothing else.
Maybe I'm stating the obvious here, but Mastodon simply doesn't have a lot of marketing muscle behind it.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There was too much friction publishing to Nature. I don't want Nature, but a similar experience, so I'm switching to Elsevier

Same energy

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are very bad at reading energy.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io -1 points 2 months ago

That's because I felt it.