this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
100 points (91.7% liked)

Technology

63277 readers
4167 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

20/12/2022 Porsche and international partners working with the Chilean operating company Highly Innovative Fuels (HIF) have started the industrial production of synthetic fuels.
https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/2022/company/porsche-highly-innovative-fuels-hif-opening-efuels-pilot-plant-haru-oni-chile-synthetic-fuels-30732.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blazera@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wow, they really dont talk about the fuel do they. What system have they found to convert atmospheric carbon into a liquid form with just electricity? Im more interested in the sequestering potential than immediately returning it to the atmosphere.

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The tech has been known for decades. It just needs clean hydrogen. You can either go the hydrogen fuel cell route, or combine it with CO2 to make liquid fuel, but the source of hydrogen is the crux of the problem.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes and ... ( @blazera Process's - - one of many) useful link : Synthetic fuel

[–] blazera@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

okay so I've got my renewable electricity, and my hydrogen...now what? Im asking about a process here

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Im bigger on the fan producing enough fuel for the mining and construction of it and the facility and maintenance and upkeep. This has been a re-occuring point of can we create wind and solar panels just from wind and solar panels without digging up oil. As for sequestration. What is the point if we are still digging up oil and refining it into the same fuel??? I could see it being something if we were otherwise not digging up hydrocarbons but I fail to see how sequestration is better than replacement while we are doing that.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I dont know what your first two sentences are about. As for sequestration, just imagine it as an independent effort to reduce greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is biochar which can be scaled by providing cheap pyrolysis retorts and training how to bioactivate it. Incentive is increased agriculture productivity long-term. Capture should be done directly from flue gas since not needing enrichment. There are also carbon-negative concretes which have good potential for capture.

Synfuels from 100% renewable are at least carbon neutral, which is as good as it gets.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

that's not taking carbon from the atmosphere, that's just carbon left behind from burning organic materials. That's emitting CO2.