Firefox

20351 readers

133 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

133

Google looks to be fully shutting down unsupported extensions and ad blockers in Chrome – which might push some folks to switch to Firefox (www.techradar.com)

submitted 9 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thebigslime@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

LibreWolf for desktop, Mull for Android.

[–] jangdonggun@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago

Keep in mind both LibreWolf and Mull are very slow because LibreWolf disabled WebGL, enabling higher privacy features, and Mull disabled JIT, a massive performance hit.

This is for people who don't know then blaming Firefox being slow, LibreWolf and Mull are slower version of Firefox, just that.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Aren't those Firefox with some patches?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

deleted by creator

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Isn't chromium open source too?

[–] linuxPIPEpower@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago

someone else can probably give a more comprehensive/correct answer but here is how I understand it. i believe chromium is open source and chrome is mostly chromium but also some proprietary (and therefor unknown) bits are included. whereas firefox is entirely open source, meaning you could compile it yourself and still end up with the same package.