this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
2512 points (97.3% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

4056 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2ez@lemmy.world 99 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Some fragile male egos in this thread. Looking forward to your complaints about the Barbie movie. Sad and pathetic.

[–] Akasazh 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't know what you're talking about. For me the fragile egos are way down the thread, all massively downvoted. The absolute majority is supportive.

[–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People are addicted to rage.

A few arseholes on twitter saying negative things sets a chain reaction of rage to all those who are addicted to their own emotions.

The mature thing to do in all cases is to let it go.

It's also worth noting that the original comments could be aimed at the fact she is a model, and not because she is a woman.

#zoolander

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Are you kidding? I just told you!

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not everybody's sorting by Top, friend. They're probably down there where you say they are though.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My comment on the Barbie movie ..Kens belt buckle looks like a liny Metallica logo...horses are rad and Alan is terrible.

[–] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago

Alan was literally MVP wtf

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Why would anyone care about an hour-long toy commercial?

[–] Ticktok@lemmy.one 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because that's not what the movie is at all. It actually spends a fair amount of time mocking consumerism and hating on the negative impact barbie has had on women's self image and feminism. It's actually pretty crass with a lot of offcolor jokes. It's more targeted to adults who had Barbies as kids during on the 80s/90s.

[–] funkless@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I did the Barbenheimer double bill. The one that felt like a.commercial was the "YU ESS EH" nature of promoting American War interests.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Barbenheimer

I love this.

[–] tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oppenheimer forces the viewer to strongly consider the awful thing that was done those two days.

I'm as critical of the US as anyone I've met but your take is bizarrely ignorant to what they were trying to do. I feel like you'd have to be intentionally missing the point to come away thinking that movie was pro-america in any way.

[–] funkless@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I recognize that both movies (Barbie and Oppenheimer) have some self-depreciating self-criticism of their own meta-apparatus. Oppenheimer's story - if we keep the narrow focus to just JRO - is a story about a scientist who gains political power through the usefulness of his theories only to lose that political power due to political influences and return being "merely" a scientist with his own tropical getaway, publishing deals, tenure at a university, worldwide fame and recognition and a host of baubles and awards from across the globe, including the USA just 9 years later.

I think it does read pro-USA, especially to this foreigner who lives and works in the USA. It does not cover the political and medical implications of the New Mexico testing grounds, it does not cover the impact on Japanese civilians from the war (indeed the only victim we see is imaginary in Oppenheimer's mind). It's not a particularly interesting story, and its characters barely suffer (in comparison to the suffering they caused).

I'd argue that it's propaganda to make it seem like bombing civilian targets in Japan was necessary, worthwhile and agonized over by heroic people. Which you may believe is true, but doesn't stop the movie from being pro-USA. I'd even argue it's depiction of McCarthy-ism is self-serving as it seems to suggest, subjectively to me at least, that "look at how far we've come."

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of course it's a toy commercial.

[–] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago

It was a really fricken good movie, way to be closed minded and talk shit about something you didn't watch

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They said the same thing about the LEGO movie and how wrong they were...

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The LEGO Movie is a long advertisement, too.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The LEGO movie is a work of art... and yes, to some extent an advertisement of the brand.