Science

23335 readers

3 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

Wake@hexbear.net

Younger generations are facing a higher risk of cancer than their parents. Each successive generation born during the second half of the 20th century has faced a higher risk of 17 cancers (www.scimex.org)

submitted 9 months ago by realitista@lemm.ee to c/science@hexbear.net

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/3567461

Younger generations are facing a higher risk of cancer than their parents. Each successive generation born during the second half of the 20th century has faced a higher risk of 17 cancers, accordi...

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/science by /u/mvea on 2024-08-01 06:59:55+00:00.

Original Title: Younger generations are facing a higher risk of cancer than their parents. Each successive generation born during the second half of the 20th century has faced a higher risk of 17 cancers, according to a US study. 10 of these cancers are linked to obesity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 13 points 9 months ago

I think the argument is more that longer lifespans allow for cancer to develop, but I don't think you can say a given 80 year old is more likely to die of cancer than a heart attack or car accident so I don't know that it would artificially inflate the cancer numbers anyway