this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
404 points (98.8% liked)

World News

41372 readers
4632 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sandbox@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I looked into why it’s rated mixed. The failed fact checks are total nonsense - there are five of them.

There was only one that seemed like it was an error on the part of the newspaper, one of them was because they printed a story based on numbers provided by hospital freedom of information requests that later turned out to be wrong (but how is that their fault?) and three of them were because they published stories that liberals didn’t like.

What a fucking joke of a fact check website. Get this right-wing shite fucking deleted.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Seems you’d want to understand # of errors/omissions/mistruths as a proportion of total news stories, and the impact of and reason for those issues.

Get a sense Guardian is quite trustworthy but it would require a much more extensive look than the fact checker appears to have taken (and obviously than I’ve taken). Thanks for recommending caution here.

[–] jadedwench@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Due to Sync, it is always an eyesore of huge images due to the multiple links. I just blocked the bot so I can move on. I should dig through my settings again to find a happy medium.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Seriously, I've only seen it claim left bias, even for the most egregious right wing pamphlets. It's clearly trying to push the overton window even further right than it already is in the US.

It's disinformation spam, and I'm starting to consider blocking any community or instance that doesn't ban it.