OpenChristian

101 readers
119 users here now

(Formerly Lemm.ee)

This is a community for progressive Christians and friends to discuss our faith, support each other, and share inspiration for our spiritual journeys.

We seek God's message of Peace, Love, and Grace through following the Spirit of Christ.


OpenChristian Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/s/K3NwAgNj2a

OpenChristian Discord Server: https://discord.com/invite/KwyUcXv

LGBT Discord Server: https://discord.com/invite/e8HXnzV


Wiki: https://reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/w/index

FAQ: [https://reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/w/faq]

[Lemmy mirror of FAQ] https://lemmy.world/post/32102984

Online Resources: https://reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/w/onlineresources


Community Rules

  1. No bigotry or oppressive rhetoric.

All misogyny, racism, antisemitism, LGBTQ+phobia, etc. will result in removal and a permanent ban. This includes commenting that LGBTQ¢+ love or relationships are sinful. Be aware that using “Pharisee” as a negative slur is considered anti-Semitic.

1b. Side B folks are welcome, but follow Rule 1. If you are a Side B Christian, please respect Rule 1 above, but know that you belong here and we want you to participate.


  1. Do not promote oppressive/harmful ideology.

This includes all attempts to promote or normalise hate, shame, or fear within Christianity (e.g. purity culture, scaremongering against gender-transitioning, “complementarianism’”, or “demonic” attacks).


  1. No sectarianism.

Legitimate criticism of other Christians/ faiths is allowed but refrain from prejudice against entire denominations/groups, and against other religions (e.g. Islamophobia).


  1. No disparaging Christianity

This is primarily a supportive space for anyone who identifies as Christian. While everyone is welcome to participate we ask that no one disparages Christianity.


  1. Be respectful and polite.

No personal attacks or accusations, harassment, misrepresentation of others, or insults. This also includes forcing debate, gatekeeping, and denying the validity of another's faith.


  1. Don't be a troll or a jerk.

Don't concern troll, play devil's advocate, or pretend to be confused when you really just want to start a debate. This Rule will be interpreted at the moderators’ discretion.


  1. No spamming or proselytizing

Don't post here if you're mass posting to other Communities. Don't post here for self-promotion unless it's particularly relevant to this subreddit. This is not your soapbox, and we are not here for you to preach at us. If you want to promote your media please ask permission from the mods.


  1. Be sensitive about linking to triggering N~ content.

Because we want this space to be as safe as possible, we discourage posting images or links to oppressive rhetoric from others. However, we do understand that venting is important sometimes. If you must post something potentially triggering, mark it nsfw or use spoiler tags, and censor any identifying information.


  1. Discussion of the ongoing israeli-Palestinian conflict is temporarily prohibited.

This topic has proven to be too divisive to discuss without consistently violating this subreddit’s rules. In order to maintain peace and to continue supporting one another, content regarding the ongoing Israel-Palestinian conflict is not permitted at this time.


Notice:

OpenChristian is inclusive, open and welcoming of all. We are LGBTQ+ affirming, but we welcome any who have chosen celibacy, as long as you respect Rule 1.

Do not post or comment about how you believe homosexuality is a sin.

We have heard this a thousand times, and you have nothing new to contribute to the conversation.

If you do this, you will be banned.

Please note that as a progressive Christian community, we are explicitly followers of Christ, as well as LGBTQ+ affirming and egalitarian.

Friends are very welcome to participate, no matter what you believe.

But this is not the place for questioning or debating these positions.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

open_christian@lemmy.ca resources list 

LGBTQ+ resources 

https://www.thetrevorproject.org/

https://truecolorsunited.org/

https://glaad.org/resourcelist/

https://www.queerliberationlibrary.org/

LGBTQ+ friendly churches 

https://www.gaychurch.org/find_a_church/

https://www.inclusive-church.org/church-directory/

Find a Church | Is Your Church Clear?

LGBTQ+ positive religious resources 

https://www.lgbtchristianresources.com/

https://lgbtqfamilyacceptance.org/faith-based-resources/

https://www.queertheology.com/

Faith resources

https://www.biblegateway.com/

https://patriciaadderley.com/20-best-christian-websites-to-grow-in-faith/

Christian Resources - Christian.net

Proverbs 31 Ministries

General resources  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suicide_crisis_lines?wprov=sfti1#Crisis_lines_by_country mega list 

US: https://humantraffickinghotline.org/en/report-trafficking

US: https://www.feedingamerica.org/find-your-local-foodbank

US: 988 US suicide hotline

The last 3 are US specific if you would like please comment your local version of needed programs or websites. I have attempted to vet the resources and websites provided If you are aware with any problems with any of these let me know as well thank you and have a wonderful day!

2
 
 

VIEWS HERE MAY NOT REFLECTED EXACT VIEWS OR POLICIES OF open_christian@lemmy.ca this is temporary and a Lemmy FAQ will be created in the coming months FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS If you have any question, please check it hasn't been covered below before messaging the mods.

  1. General What is Christianity?

Christianity, in its broadest sense, is faith in the first century Jewish teacher Jesus of Nazareth, who was called "Christ" (χριστος) by Greek-speakers, and "Messiah" (מָשִׁיחַ) by Hebrew-speakers (both terms meaning that he was "anointed", or specially appointed by God). Christian faith can refer to faith in Jesus Christ's teachings, but often includes faith in him personally, and in what he achieved through his life, death, and resurrection.

Most Christians are Trinitarian, meaning that they believe Jesus was not just a mortal man, but also the eternal God incarnated on earth. A minority of Christians reject this, and they are referred to as Unitarian.

Christianity is still the world's largest religion, with 2.8 billion followers. The majority of these belong to the Catholic Church (~1.3 billion), while the next largest united Church is the Eastern Orthodox Church (~220 million). Various Protestant Churches together make up approx. 1 billion followers.

Ultimately different people will understand Christianity in different ways, and practice it in different ways. That's fine. The mods have their personal beliefs and understanding of Christianity, but we want to be as broad and inclusive as possible. So anyone who identifies as a Christian in any way will be welcomed in fellowship and love. What is Progressive Christianity?

There is no agreed definition, and this is kind of the point. It is characterised by a general inclusivity, tolerance of diversity, and openness to different interpretations and faith journeys. It allows a range of varying doctrines and worship practices depending on the individual's conscience, culture, and reason. However, alongside our faith in Christ, a few other positions are usually held in common.

Firstly, Progressives will generally be LGBTQ+ Affirming, and they will stand up for the rights, and the full equality and inclusion of minorities, the poor, and the oppressed.

Secondly, Progressives will generally not consider themselves beholden to any human authority, either a particular church, leader, tradition, creed, doctrine, or even scripture, though they may honour, respect, and seek guidance from some or all of them. Progressives generally have a more open approach to scripture, not insisting on the doctrine of Biblical Inerrancy, but willing to interpret the texts through a variety of methods.

And thirdly, Progressives will generally seek dialogue and respect with other faiths, though there is a diversity of opinion on the spiritual truths of other religions. What is Scripture?

Scripture is a collection of ancient writings that have been collected and used by communities of believers, who came to accept them as carrying a special authority for the understanding of their faith. This collection is called a "canon".

Different communities of Christians have different canons of scripture. But on the whole the majority of writings are agreed on and held in common. Which Translation should I use?

The standard answer is that the best translation is the one you read!

There are hundreds of published translations, and each have their pros and cons. The mods will allow quotes and discussions from any translation you wish, however bad it is (naming no names, The Message). You can even include your own personal translation if you wish. Commenters will then be welcome (even encouraged) to compare and contrast the submitted quote with other translations, or even the original texts, however they wish.

Ultimately, using more than one translation is the best way to get a sense of the meaning of the original text, like looking at a jewel from different angles to catch the light in different ways.

However, if you are confused by the sheer number of translations available, a good standard is the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). This was produced by a broad team of scholars from a wide variety of traditions and backgrounds, so provides a good sense of what is generally accepted. It has its faults, as all translations do, but it is a solid version to use as a base text for study. The current "updated edition" is called the NRSVUE, but apart from some minor updates, this is largely the same text as the NRSV. What is the original text? Should I read that instead?

Unfortunately we do not have the original text of any of the writings of the Bible. Because they were written so long ago, and paper is fragile and perishes over time, all we have are copies of copies. Furthermore, due to the problems of humans trying to copy texts by hand, our surviving copies sometimes disagree with one another.

Why then don't we use the earliest copy we have? The earliest are three very early complete (or almost) Greek translations of the Bible from the 4th century CE. However they also disagree with one another in places. We also have fragments of earlier Greek copies, and they have some disagreements. The earliest Hebrew mansucript of the Old Testament we have is the "Masoretic Text", with the earliest complete mansucript dated to dated to the 10th century CE. (The New Testament was written in Greek, so that is more reliable in that sense).

We have found a remarkable store of texts of the Old Testament written in Hebrew which predate even the earliest Greek Bibles (known as the Dead Sea Scrolls) but these are fragmentary, and show variances. They provide an excellent source for scholars, but on their own they cannot be used to reconstruct the entire original Hebrew Bible.

Ultimately, scholars can compare and contrast all of these sources, and use scientific, historical, and linguistic analysis to reconstruct a "critical text". The most widely-used for the New Testament is the Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece, currently on its 28th edition. For the Old Testament translators usually follow the Masoretic Text and correct it against the Greek and Dead Sea Scrolls where appropriate.

If you wish to read the critical text (or any of the early manuscripts), you should, but first you'll need to learn Ancient Hebrew and Ancient Greek, which few can boast of. How can I know how to interpret a text?

There are many ways of interpreting any passage. A particular method of interpretation is called a hermeneutic. The following summary of various methods isn't intended to be exclusive, but can be used as a helpful starting point.

The "Letter" of the Text

Literal This doesn't just mean "factual" but refers to the original intended meaning of the author. Historical, cultural, linguistic, and literary context can help understand what the author originally meant. For instance, when a passage mentions Jerusalem, the author is often referring to the historical physical city.

In common discourse this method is generally split into different interpretations depending on the recognised genre of the text. Examples of these Biblical genres are: History, Prophecy, Apocalypse, Poetry, Psalm, Theology, Myth, Allegory, Drama, Wisdom, Biography, Epistle, Gospel, Hagiography

The "Spirit" of the Text This involves moving beyond the Literal and understanding the spiritual or figurative meaning that the text has for ourselves. This is traditionally divided into three senses.

Typological This looks for figures of Christ or the Church throughout the scriptures. For instance, Jerusalem can often be interpreted as a symbolic figure for the Christian Church.

Moral This seeks to interpret a passage as a guide for our own behaviour. For instance, Jerusalem can often also be interpreted as a metaphor for our own soul.

Anagogical or Eschatological This is the interpretation that looks towards the perfected Kingdom of God. For instance, Jerusalem can often also be interpreted as the perfected Kingdom God has promised. How can I find a Church to attend?

This is a common question, and /u/JusticeMercyLove has helpfully put together the following guide:

Finding a New Church

Perhaps you are looking for a new progressive church/congregation. Or, perhaps you have moved to a new location and are looking for a new progressive church/congregation. I see and hear this question occasionally and have been developing some guidelines. Let’s begin our conversation by saying that finding a new church is one of the most difficult and personal dilemmas that we encounter. Add in one or more family members and possible outcomes are multiplied with each addition.

As I see it, here are a few considerations for where you may consider going to church. I have learned that you cannot fully trust the denomination’s stance on certain beliefs or issues when picking out a local congregation. For example, the denomination may say that they are “Open and Affirming” as well as committed to justice. However, the people in a local congregation may never consider having an LGBTQIA+ pastor or council member. Here’s another example. The denominational website may utilize women, minorities, and be supportive of refugee resettlement. However, the people of the local congregation may never consider a woman minister, have no minority members, and stay away from the Hispanic support centre in the area.

It is important to understand that “Welcoming” means different things to different people and to different congregations. Even the phrase, “Open and Affirming” can also mean different things to different people and congregations.
    A. “Open and Affirming” should mean that all are welcome to fully participate and serve and to be fully considered for leadership positions. This includes all LGBTQIA+, women, Black, Brown, all minorities – everyone!
    B. Unfortunately, “Open and Affirming” can sometimes be advertised by the church more as an aspirational position. In other words, perhaps the congregation is taking steps toward being Open and Affirming, but not all members are fully supportive of this. Perhaps the pastor or the council is pushing for it, but the congregation is dragging their heels. Sadly, when LGBTQIA+ individuals begin to engage with this type of a congregation and develop relationships, they can be re-traumatized when the congregation rejects them for a position of leadership or rejects a proposed Open and Affirming program.
    C. Welcoming can mean that everyone is welcome to attend (and even participate in some programs), but are rejected for prominent or leadership roles. Therefore, one thing to pay attention to in large churches with many staff positions is whether they have women, LGBTQIA+, Black, Brown, and other minorities in key leadership positions. Or, do they limit women to be the “Children’s Pastor.” Look at members of the church board.
    D. Welcoming can sometimes be a key advertising tool to attract new people, whether they are truly welcoming or not. Still, most of these congregations roll out the welcome mat simply to get new people in the door. Then, it’s bait and switch time. The more involved someone gets, the more one learns the unwritten expectations, beliefs, doctrines, and those things that will disqualify persons from serving as they desire.

Music is important to many people. Some like choirs. Some like a full rock band. Some like old hymns. Some like Gregorian chants. Some like Kum-Ba-Yah choruses.

If you are coming to higher churches (think Catholic, Episcopal, UCC/Congregational, PCUSA/Presbyterian, ELCA/Lutheran, and United Methodist churches), please be aware:
A. There may still be some people, sometimes a majority, who support MAGA/right-wing politics.
B. They may often use litanies and responsive readings, written prayers,
C. Sermons can typically be written and follow the lectionary, and
D. They may often utilize regular rituals and follow the seasons of the church year.

If you are coming to lower churches (think Baptist, Evangelical Free, Nazarene, Wesleyan, Assembly of God, Pentecostal, “Global Methodists,” and independent churches), please be aware:
A. Depending on the area, sometimes above 70% of their members tend to support MAGA/right-wing politics.
B. Preachers can sometimes focus on “Bible-Based preaching” which parses out how they apply the Bible to our lives today - in their opinion. They may have notes, but do not typically read their sermons.
C. Prayers are rarely written.
D. Litanies and responsive readings are rare.
E. They tend to shun rituals, unless it has to do with the offering protocols. 🙂

There are a few denominations (and congregations) which tend to be more conservative in their view of the Bible and yet more progressive socially and politically. These include progressive Mennonites, Quakers, some Church of the Brethren, and American Baptist churches. Of course, that does not mean that all local congregations adhere to these denominational positions - watch the continuums.

Variables:
A. In general churches in rural areas or small communities tend to be more conservative on the continuum. Urban churches tend to be more progressive. Of course there are always exceptions to this.
B. In many denominations, the pastor often seems to have a significant role in the positions and stances taken by the congregation. For example, if a pastor tends to be more progressive, then over time, the congregation tends to lean that way also. By the same token, a pastoral change can bring about huge changes, sometimes to the chagrin of the congregation. For example, this happened in some Southern Baptist congregations (in the USA) about 30 years ago, when they made a concerted move toward fundamentalism.
C. The social make-up of the congregation is important to most people looking for a new church. Unfortunately, this takes some time for visitors to fully grasp. Do you want to be where prominent members of the community worship actively? Or, would you rather hang out with the blue collar crowd. This is different in every community and town.
D. The distance you are willing to travel must be considered from two different perspectives. First, if you only attend worship at most once per week, you may be willing to travel a ways, in order to find the church you want to attend. However, if you anticipate being regularly involved in additional activities connected with the church (like at a community food pantry or homeless centre), then you may not want to travel very far.

A few suggestions.
A. Where do some of your friends attend? Ask them about how they feel about where they go.
B. Does the church you are considering have activities that you are interested in?
C. How involved in the community is the church you are attending?

There are some people that consider it their purpose to be a loving, progressive voice in a congregation that has not yet fully adopted this position. I’m not sure it is healthy to be a loving, progressive voice in a congregation that is 100% MAGA/right-wing and is overtly vocal in their opposition to LGBTQIA+ and all Democrats/progressives. Unless you believe yourself to be a modern-day Jeremiah, do not attempt this. On the other hand, I do believe that it is possible for some loving, progressive churchgoers to attend a congregation that has a diverse and mixed group of conservatives and progressives who are at least willing to listen to one another. Each person must decide this for themselves.

Finally, it is okay just to attend sometimes. I left evangelicalism for good at the end of 2016. I could not attend any longer, in order to salvage my mental health and my faith. I did not attend church regularly for a few years. I attended a PCUSA with my dad when I visited him and appreciated that congregation. I attended perhaps a few times a year, and always sat in the back, and left early. I ended up discovering a wonderful congregation near my home that I continue to grow into and learn more about. Are we perfect? No, neither one of us is. But it is good for me, and good for them. I even became a member a couple years ago. And if you happen to visit a church that doesn't suit you, it is okay to say, "Let's not do that again." 🙂

Peace, Love, and Justice, sjb 2025 02 09 p.s. please message me if you have corrections or suggestions for this guide. ty 2. OpenChristian's Intentions and Conduct Why don't many of you believe in the doctrine of Biblical Inerrancy, what's wrong with it?

This is too complicated a subject to go into detail here unfortunately. If you are interested then check out some of the books and resources in the wiki for full discussions of this. Particularly Keith Ward or Bradley Jersak's books.

The problem, in brief, is that the doctrine prohibits any other interpretation of scripture than the Inerrentist one. Ultimately many will take the perspective that we shouldn't prejudge how scripture should be read, or assume that all the scriptural texts should be read the same way. What happens if I break the Rules?

We intend this Sub to be a friendly and welcoming place to all. However, we will not tolerate intolerance. Our Rules are intended to protect everyone, and ensure all of us are free to participate without fear or offense.

Mods will be free to judge each incident on a case-by-case basis, but for transparency our response to any post which breaks a Rule will follow the below guidelines as far as possible:

An accidental or minor offence will be deleted but no further action taken. Repeated or more serious offences will recieve a suspension between 48 hours to 14 days, depending on the severity of the offence. This is intended to provide space for tempers to cool, and people to reflect on their actions.

We would hope that this would result in an apology to the offended party when the suspension is lifted, Furthermore, if a poster responds to mod action with maturity, regret, and apology, this will go a long way towards a less-harsh approach.

There are cases where we would have zero tolerance though. This would be e.g. oppressive language such as homophobia, anti-semitism, or misogyny, hate-speech, support of illegal acts, or direct promotion of conspiracy theories or extreme harmful ideology (e.g. white supremacy). This kind of post will result in a permanent ban. What is the expected conduct for the Moderators?

Mods should be expected to act fairly, openly, and respectfully to everyone.

We will do our best but we are human and can make mistakes. If you believe we have been unfair, unclear, or direspectful to anyone then any action can be appealed by messaging the mods as a group and another mod will reply to you to confirm or overturn the action.

Mods generally should be expected not to moderate a discussion with another redditor in which they also participate. And when a mod is in direct disagreement with another redditor, another mod will generally be asked to carry out any required mod action to avoid the impression of unfairness or abuse of mod powers.

Mods should be expected to provide a clear reason for any deletion of posts, suspensions or bans.

However, we may sometimes forget to do this, so please just ask us if so.

Mods should be expected to take prompt action against any comment that is offensive, disrespectful, or harmful to anyone.

However, we cannot spot everything, so please use the Report button. This alerts us that there's a problem and we can address it much quicker. We do not want to leave hurtful or harmful comments up for any longer than necessary.
  1. Resources for Frequently Asked Questions If you are Christians, why don't you believe that homosexuality is a sin?

    From Queer Grace: "Why do some Christians think it's ok to be gay when the Bible says it isn't?"

    From Queer Theology: "Is it really OK?"

    From the Reformation Project: A summary of the Biblical case for LGBT affirmation

    From the Reformation Project: The need for reform on LGBT issues

    This essay, which tackles relevant Bible passages one at a time, responding to various arguments against LGBTQ inclusion.

What do you believe about transgender people?

From Queer Theology: "Transgender and Christian?"

From the Human Rights Campaign: What does the Bible say about transgender people?

The many excellent comments in this thread.

How can you be pro-feminist and Christian?

Men, Women and Biblical Equality

Why You Should Be a Christian Feminist

Why Not Have a Woman Preach?

Humility without Hierarchy: Mutual Submission in Marriage

Who Was Junia?

What do you all believe about premarital sex?

Thread: Where does the Bible specifically say no premarital sex?

Thread: Should intimacy be saved for marriage?

Thread: Sex Before Marriage

Should Christians date non-Christians?

Thread: How do you feel about being in a relationship with / marrying a non-christian?

Thread: Is it ok to marry someone who isn't Christian?

I'm a Christian but I am also interested in tarot cards, crystals, astrology, etc. What do you all think?

Thread: New-Age Nonsense?

Thread: So, I would like all of your opinions on Christians who practice neo-paganism.

I am LGBTQ+/Affirming but I'm troubled about this passage that seems to condemn homosexuality. Can I post about it for discussion?

Please check our resources and FAQ first, and you can search our past posts for several previous threads explaining the Affirming argument for every passage you're thinking of.

While we don't want to ban discussion of any controversial passage, we will be very sensitive to such posts as we are well aware that they are used by trolls to JAQ-off as a bad-faith tactic. If for example Leviticus 18:22 is posted without any accompanying contextual information, or clear pro-LGBTQ+ commentary the mods will most likely remove it to be safe. 4. Simple answers for simple questions I am LGBTQ+, but I'm not sure whether I accept open and affirming theology. Am I welcome here?

Yes, absolutely. We have celibate LGBTQ+ Christians who participate here. Just be sure to respect Rule 1b from the sidebar. I am new to Christianity / exploring my gender or sexual identity / confused and lonely. Can I post about that here?

YES! Introduce yourself and be a part of our community. I don't consider myself a Christian, can I still post?

YES! You also are very welcome. While this sub is intended as a place primarily for Christians, anyone who has any interest in reading the Bible for any reason is welcome to join us. Whether you are simply curious what it says, or find parts of it inspiring to your own faith journey, whatever that may be, please participate and contribute freely.

All we ask is that you don't make any comment overtly disparaging or insulting Christianity. But that's just good manners; we won't demand you follow Christianity yourself. I believe in some conservative theology/biblical inerrancy. Can I still post?

YES! You are welcome too! While this is a space intended primarily for progressive Christians and progressive interpretations of scripture, any and all poeple and readings of scripture are acceptable, and can provide a helpful contrast and comparison, All we ask is that you don't try to proselytise about conservative doctrines or insist that the conservative interpretation is the only "right" way to interpret the Bible. I've seen a comment I disagree with. Am I allowed to refute it?

The idea of the sub is to allow open discussion from anyone who wishes to post. To nurture a friendly and welcoming space for this we want to encourage everyone to respect each other and communicate in love and fellowship. We're not interested in attacks, arguments, or divisive debates.

You can always post your own interpretation but you wouldn't be allowed to say that anyone else's interpretation is wrong. You also shouldn't say anything like, "This interpretation is the only correct one", or "All other interpretatons are false". That would break Rule 5 ("Be Respectful and Polite"), even if your comment isn't directed at a specific redditor. How can you call yourself "Open" when your rules censor certain opinions

The Open in our title refers to being open to those commonly excluded from the Church - specifically LGBTQ+, women, or any other oppressed minorities. It does not give carte blanche for hate speech, bigotry, or incivility. I disagree with LGBTQ+/liberals/feminism/CRT/science etc.

And you're free to do so. But in the words of Paul, "whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God." (Rom 14:22 NIV). If you have legitimate and respectful questions then you can ask them bu this isn't the place for forcing debate on these issues. I want to post something but I'm not sure if its allowed.

Check the rules and this FAQ, If you're still not sure then just message the mods. We're friendly people and we'd love to help you. I'm very angry with the Church/Christianity/Christians and need to vent

You are free to do so, venting is healthy, and there is much in the Church today that can (and should) be legitimately criticised. Just make sure you don't accidently imply that all Christians/Churches etc are the same as those who have hurt/angered you, or even all within a particular denomination/movement/tradition. That is prejudice, and we discourage that. I think you are all a bunch of sinners and you're going to hell.

Ok. We already know that many people think this about us, so you don't need to post about it here. This is not the subreddit for you, so move along. Last revised by Naugrith 3 months ago

3
 
 

Hi everyone,

Just putting out a quick call — I’m currently looking for a few more moderators to help out here at open_christian@lemmy.ca.


This space was created for open-minded Christians and seekers who value inclusivity, dialogue, and a faith that makes room for questions, diversity, and growth, as well as give the Users of r/OpenChristian their own space on Lemmy.

It’s been great seeing folks join and engage, but I could really use some extra help keeping things active and welcoming.

Right now, I have one other mod — @Pacrat173@lemmy.world — who checks in and posts from time to time.

But with everything else I’m moderating across Lemmy.ca, Blahaj, and beyond, I’m starting to get a bit overwhelmed, both with my declining Mental Health, as well as with the stress of it all.


If you’re interested in helping moderate (even lightly), I’d really appreciate it.

Experience isn’t necessary — just a shared spirit of openness and kindness.


Feel free to comment, you’d like to step up!

Peace and blessings, – Teknevra

4
 
 

Hey everyone,

I just wanted to remind everyone that this space is open for all of us to share our thoughts, experiences, and discussions. As the creator and a mod here, I want to assure you that there is no gatekeeping. Everyone, whether you're a user or a fellow mod, is encouraged to post freely.

I've noticed that I'm often the only one posting, and while there are comments, it would be wonderful to see more activity from all of you. Your voices and perspectives are what make this community vibrant, so don't hesitate to start a conversation or share something you think is important.

Let's work together to make this space as lively and supportive as it can be!

Thanks, and looking forward to seeing more posts!

5
 
 

As the title says, I'm looking for some potential mods to help run this community.

If you are interested, then please drop a comment to this post explaining why you believe that you would be a good fit for mod.

6
 
 

Hey y’all I watched this video a while ago and it got me wondering about any other interesting Christian relics let me know of any you find interesting

7
 
 
8
 
 

In the fifth chapter of Matthew, Yeshua gave the Sermon on the Mount, the verse quoted is the third. I always had trouble with that, and a YT channel I recently watched said that it means when we realize how little we know, let alone fully comprehend, we are humble before God, and while we fall short, we stay humble. That makes sense to me, and as I learn more about my faith, I realize how many layers of kenning there are to single words of the Rabbai, let alone entire sentences and whole teachings.

I've been thinking a lot the last couple of days about the spiritually curious or spiritual babes. Jesus demonstrates a special soft spot for these, the outcasts, and those dwellers outside of Israel. Not a single miracle I can name was performed in Israel, and Jesus himself was born in Palestine.

Jesus told the story of religious clergy passing by a man beaten, robbed, and left for dead, in their way to Temple, and of the good Samaritan. He asked who among the crowd that would lure him into speaking in favor of breaking the law would leave a lamb that in the well on the Sabbath, demonstrating that legal and moral/Godly aren't necessarily the same. Questioning, seeking, not being hell-bound on moral relativism is a good thing

I don't remember which movie it was in a couple of decades or so ago, when an archangel assured a sinner that is when you feel most lost is when you're closest to being found. Indeed. Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of heaven, that isn't lo, here, or lo there, but within you.

9
 
 

That's a phrase that I heard recently, and I think that it's from some famous philosopher, but uhm...

I don't know how to debunk it.

I'm doing my best to believe without thinking too much about that.

Some days it gets hard tho, so I'd like to hear you guys' take on it.

10
 
 

By: u/Bignosedog

There are certain aspects of our faiths that differ, but I truly believe some divides need to be understood as what the spirit of the action or belief is with the desire to find similarities rather than differences.

We are all attempting to be part of Jesus's flock which is what he desires. Please keep that in mind when you think about our differences. Though Jesus's sheep dog (pig?) may need to work harder on some of us than others, we are still looking and wanting that guidance.

The animosity I see between Christians is heartbreaking. We disagree on many things even within denominations, but we are all trying to follow the same God. I have strong feelings towards some and believe their actions hurt the cause, but on some levels we are all still trying. Viewing it through that lens will soften the heart and allow for a discourse that might, probably not, but might actually lead to the change we wish to see.

11
 
 

Let me say that I'm not opposed to consensual adult sex work, at least in a secular sense, I don't believe that it should be illegal for the seller or even buyer (although Swaggert was never charged, also legally the correct decision as the evidence to meet the standard of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt was not there.)

But in Swaggert's case it makes him a rather blatant hypocrite not to mention clear sinner considering he was married.

What makes it even worse was his tearful apology video in 1988 only for him to get caught with another prostitute just three years later and showing the whole thing was likely an act.

But that's far from the worst that he did. Aside from his general promotion of hate in the 80s he engaged in fundraising for the Mozambique rebel group RENAMO, RENAMO was fighting to topple the Marxist government of Mozambique but engaged in such brutality and atrocities that even the US government opted not to back them.

And thus Swaggert opted to engage in fundraising for them and used a lot of his ministry funds to provide support.

Not much different from what funding ISIS or the Lord's Resistance Army would be.

Definitely his greatest crime and one he doesn't get enough attention for.

So he's with God now...I can only imagine what's being said. I am also trying not to rejoice in anyone's death.

12
 
 

Focus on The family as an organization genuinely beyond confuses me.

How in the world are you gonna promote helping families and leading with Jesus example then proceed to refuse service to lgbtq people and call transitioning a "devastating condition"???

How is calling children of gay and lesbian parents "Human guinea pigs in the same sex experiment" ANYTHING LIKE JESUS??

I'm aware there are many Christian organizations that are against lgbtq, duh!

But how does ANYONE no matter belief, think this is a good way to lead??

Maybe its just me, but I dont think this is the way to guide ppl to Christ?

I believe the president Jim Daly said marriage equality is the downfall of civilization.

Again ppl can believe whatever they want to, but I'm really struggling to see where this counts as leading with Jesus' example 😭

13
 
 

By: u/That_Chikkabu

So I’ve been kind of deconstructing the concept of hell, I’ve been talking to a fellow about it and they said that Matthew 25:41-46 depicts an actual eternal hell punishment.

They’ve mentioned depending how we use the Greek word, if we use eternal as a different way that most scholars do than the eternal also used for eternal life would be the same thing as well. Meaning, eternal life isn’t actually eternal but it is sort of temporary.

What do you guys think? Do you think hell is actually ever depicted eternally and concious? Is this more of a God issue than a Bible issue?

14
 
 

Not sure if I'm technically Christian anymore, but for the sake of the discussion let's just pretend that I am. I still believe in a soul and a god in any case. I've been reading about determinism, and it really disturbs me. The idea that everything we do is determined solely by a chain of external factors that have happened to us, and we have no hypothetical ability to make any other choice than the one we do.

I see mostly pysicalist atheists argueing for this, but I fail to see how it changes much even if God is in the picture. This means that feeling proud of people, feeling disappointed in people, choosing to be better or to stagnate, being encouraged by people with good hearts or discouraged by people who 'choose' to do evil, and most importantly moral culpability.....it's all an illusion. A practically useful one in our day to day, but an illusion. Courage, justice, choice, compassion, creativity, freedom, all of these concepts that make us human are paper-thin under this framework. We are incapable of choosing our own paths, and we always have been. We were never capable of making different choices. Autonomy isn't real.

Now I don't want this to be true. I want there to be, ultimately, some cohesive self that is capable of making free (not uninfluenced, but free) decisions of whether or not we act in ways that are good or evil, by some complex and unknowable system. But even with the existence of God and a soul taken into account, I can't understand how that could be. Physics or the existence of the spiritual aside, it just becomes a logic problem at a certain point. Either everything we do has a reason, which ultimately has to be external, or the things we do are entirely random.

Which feels pretty bleak. No one can claim ownership of any of their 'decisions,' good or evil. No one can claim they chose to rise above themselves and no one can claim anyone else could have chosen differently when they do something wrong. There is no such thing as responsibility. Who we are is entirely governed by chance. 'Humanity' is mechanical. Does it have to be this way, even under the Christian view? Am I thinking in too severe black and white?

15
 
 

By: u/redheaded_olive12349

In my specific faith, I believe that the bible was mistranslated or misinterpreted over time.

Such things as homosexuality and stuff (you know all kinds of stuff) were never condemned in the original bible.

We believe that early Christians never believed these things and that was the original bible.

16
 
 

Edit, because I forgot to add crosspost link:

kbin.earth/m/lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone/t/1563826/Trans-teen-s-chess-win-in-Germany-prompts-backlash#comments

Nadja Jussupow, head of the German Commission for Women’s Chess and a former champion, stated that more trans women have been entering women’s tournaments since Germany’s Self-Determination Act took effect in 2021. The Times reports that she claimed some cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition.

Mfw women are covertly anti-feminist. Lady, either we're equally good, as individuals, equally different/equally the same realms, or we aren't.

Same for my religious kin. Either God made us all who we are, via nature, nurture and both, or S/he didn't. We need to get over ourselves and out of our own way. Obviously including myself.

17
 
 

This is one of the most common criticisms about Christianity that I have heard.

18
 
 

Crossposted from https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/28309758

The comments under the post get gross pretty quickly. I hope we can see this new community as kindred, and as another welcoming space for our LGBTQ family.

19
 
 

BEFORE YOU GUYS START A WAR. PLEASE HEAR ME OUT!!!!

(and Sorry for using the expression “unalive,” but this is important and I need you to read this! And I don't want it to be taken down, so sorry) Recently I found out about the founder of Save a Fox unalived (an organization that saves animals I think) unalived herself. And I told my mom, and what she said was: “Well, she shouldn't have done that” She said that unaliving yourself in a deadly sin.

But I believe she's just wrong, I don't believe god would eternally torture you because for me that would be like giving a victim of SA a life sentence. For some reason, it looks like many Christians believe people unalive themselves because of some dumb trend or something, when in reality Unalimentation is connected to things like depression, and depression is caused by things like: bullying. Witsh the save a Fox founder’s husband said that her wife was dealing with a lot of cyberbullying. People like her just needed help, but unfortunately, they didn't get it on time. That’s why I say that god punishing people that unalived themselves is like giving a victim of AS a life sentence. Those people are victims, they just needed help, and instead of giving them the help that they need, we are here just pressuring them not to unalive themselves. Witsh in fact is just making people unaliving themselves even more!

We need to understand that people don't unalive themselves because they believe it is funny or something, but because they are having a very hard time and then their brain just starts asking to end it all. And no, you just can't brush that thought. Trying not to have unaluvement thoughts is fighting your own brain, and fighting your own brain is like saying to a bird not to fly. And it doesn't matter if you say that unalaving in a sin. That is just saying to a bird not to fly because if they do you would shoot them. The same way they won't listen to you and just fly regardless of the consequences, your brain is going to have unalivement thoughts until or you end it all. Or you go get some help.

And the expression of: life is a gift from god just sounds stupid and a dumb way to justify those beliefs. In the same way some gifts can be terrible so as life. And instead of you trying to help that person fix their gift you’re just telling them that you get what you get and you can’t throw it away. Otherwise, there will be consequences.

And now talking about God handling unalivement. If god can see you so he would be able to see your sadness. And if God is all-powerful so he would be able to feel what you feel. Then having a lot of sympathy for you. So if god can see and feel you and your sadness and still choose to send you for internal torture that just would make God a horrible God. And then we get another big problem I have with a lot of other Christians. How they make God look like some sort of horrible being that has no mercy.

A good example if this is back when the wildfires were happening in California., how a lot of them say that the wildfires were a punishment by God. And at the same time, they say that God is love. But in the same way I can’t unalive 75 people and say I'm a good person so can’t god. Seriously whole forest where being destroyed. People were losing their homes and lives. And they were just making that horrible event as a deserved punishment. All of that just because some dumb dudes compared god to some guys. And for me, they are making god look like someone who can’t ignore dumb people and unalives everyone around to scare people off. Witsh that isn’t a lovely God, that is basically a tyrant.

That's why I don't believe that god made the wildfires, condemns unalivement, homosexuality, people from other faiths, or that who don’t believe in him. Or even hell to begin with. Because God is a god of love, not some monster that wants power, control, and attention.

That was my opinion, Thank you for the time. And sorry if something doesn't add up or there are a lot of misspells I'm a little tired of writing this and English is not my first language. Also, I'm better at speaking than writing. Also sorry if some information is wrong. But what I just want to say is that I don't believe god punishes people who unalived themslefs because it’s not their fault they were going through a difficult time.

20
 
 

Title kind of says it all, but I sometimes don’t get why he couldn’t have forgiven humanity.

I get time and time again he has but we didn’t listen, but I find it kind of hard to understand how an all loving God is able to give up his son.

I still love God ofc but this kind of confuses me.

Any thoughts?

21
 
 

By: u/Lone-Wolf-6314

Some argue that video games are a fictional outlet—an immersive experience where we can play as morally complex characters, even criminals, or in "bad guy vs. bad guy" scenarios.

After going through a long period of inner conflict, I decided that I would only play video games where the protagonist aligns with Christian values. If a game asks me to do something I wouldn’t agree with in real life, then I choose not to play it. However, this feels extremely limiting and cuts out so much content for me.

So, if I’m playing as a cowboy or a samurai seeking revenge against other wrongdoers—something I wouldn’t do in real life—then I feel I shouldn’t be engaging with a game like that, especially if it doesn’t emphasize forgiveness or reflect what we, as Christians, are called to do.

This personal standard has really limited the kinds of stories I feel comfortable engaging with in games.

I do want to play the video games and stories for the arc, storytelling, climax, plot, but the guilt and anxiety I feel from virtually playing as a gray or evil character upsets me even if it's for the storyline and game.

There's also another thing to consider: Everything is permissible, but not all things are spiritually beneficial. I feel like by playing as a worldly character, it can alter or change me. The other side of me however argues that I want to explore fiction and imaginative scenarios told through video games and art.

22
 
 

By: u/Emotional_Click_9970

I have had a hard time figuring out how biblical modesty about wealth should be applied today.

If we follow the scripture literally, then braided hair and gold are banned, which seems excessive.

On the other end it's obvious that someone with excessive wealth should distribute what they don't need.

The thing I'm specifically wondering is where is that line.

Like someone could survive just on food, water, and shelter, but saying that having any joy in life from possessions is a sin feels unreasonable.

At what point is using wealth for yourself a sin?

23
 
 

By: u/MistrRobott

Hey everyone!

So as the title says, I am currently looking for some progressive Christian who are accepting. Unfortunately, all the channels I have come across were conservative-leaning, and were not accepting. I would appreciate some good recommendations!

24
25
12
The Trevor Project (www.thetrevorproject.org)
 
 

Hey y’all. As we’re all aware life can be tough and we can all use help sometimes. For LGBTQ+ especially. Here’s my little bit of help for the day. I’ll make a full list of similar resources later. Including some supportive churches for those interested.

Have a wonderful day!

view more: next ›