http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/68606
I'm sure you saw this in the other poster's reply to me. It's not just inferred.
And holy crap is your comment history toxic!
How about I go through and report all of those personal attacks? Just for fun.
Okay, to be fair I quit paying attention to the New York Times before Biden dropped as they were focusing way more on Biden's age then Trump's numerous felonies.
It's inferred from intelligence reports, scholarly work by folks who specialize in Russia, and the statement of one of Putin's former aids.
If you are looking for Putin going on record saying that he wants to reconquer territories that haven't been part of Russia for well over 100 years, well you're probably not going to find anything because he's not making that proclamation publicly. Which makes sense, considering it would be a strategic mistake for him to do so.
The New York times uses Trump to sell copy.
Otherwise they would have said this months ago.
Fucking assholes.
I was aware that COVID most likely came from wet markets. But that's selling hunted meat.
Animal agriculture is raising animals to eat. Often in confinement.
With bird flu, animal agriculture is a major cause for concern. But that doesn't mean animal agriculture was the cause of all pandemics.
I guess we could argue that eating meat might be. But I also don't want to tell folks who are living in poverty in other parts of the world that they can't hunt for food.
So I feel like the ethical arguments are different too.
It's mostly corn.
Granted, it's not processed in a way to be fit for human consumption.
But still, most of it is corn. Some of it is corn cobs and stalks but most of it is kernels.
Outside of that, other grains are very common. Oats for example.
So, they are right. Raising plants to feed animals so we can eat the animals is less efficient than raising plants for us to eat. Especially in regards to cattle. Which is one of the most inefficient things in the US food system. The only reason it's so cheap is because of subsidation, both of the cattle and the corn that's grown to feed them.
And countries much larger than our own survive on rice and beans just fine. As queerminest eluded to in her comment.
As far as local food, I have a co-op. So I buy local vegetables and fruits when I can.
Nope.
Agriculture is the raising of food. Rather that's vegetables or animals.
Hunting animals and selling them in a market isn't agriculture.
And if you had argued that killing animals and eating their meat is the source of diseases, well again that's not how AIDS started. And folks are catching bird flu from their cats bringing it in the house.
So animal agriculture certainly is one vector of transmission. And factory farming especially is a big issue, because animals are often in confinement where disease spreads easily, and then transfers into people.
But no, all pandemics did not come from animal agriculture. Or even eating meat.
I think recession is part of the plan. Collapse the economy for our good buddy Putin.
I agree with your first two sentences.
But at least with COVID and AIDS, neither of those are attributed to animal agriculture. They crossed into humans through exposure to animals, but in the case of AIDS that was non-human primates most likely. And in the case of COVID it was most likely bats. But in neither of those instances were those animals part of an agricultural system. In other words they weren't being farmed
Swine flu, yes absolutely. Aids and COVID? Not so much.
I'm sure that's true for some cases.
Many though? I'm going to need a source otherwise I'm calling bullshit.
It's small-minded. In response to your question.
And I understand that there are economic incentives for people to give up their children for adoption. I also know that there's economic issues that can make it difficult to raise a child.
And I also know that the way project 2025 is written, this will also target surrogacies.
If you didn't want to argue, if you didn't want to debate, why bring it up? Because from here it feels like propaganda to be honest.
Paraphrasing: I'm a gay man who has no interest in raising children. And I'm okay with the far right targeting queer folks because won't someone think of the women? Also, here's my left cred and I don't really want to debate my position.
I mean that's what you just did right? Do you see how that looks like propaganda?