t_378

joined 2 years ago
[–] t_378@lemmy.one 2 points 4 hours ago

I believe truly having no empathy would make it impossible to form anything other than surface level friendships.

The only precious resource I own is my time, and who I spend it with. The thing in life that makes the hard times seem not so bad, and the good times twice as good, is spending with people I care about, and people that I know care about me.

To be pathological about it... My asking questions about you IS a means to an end. It gives a few useful things:

  • I learn about you
  • I learn about your worldview, I learn what motivates you
  • and I learn where you tend to sell yourself short so I know how to encourage you

Talking about yourself is "giving" when only you share vulnerability. 1 word answers is keeping your guard up. Asking about them is "giving" because you get opportunities to learn about/support/uplift them. People like getting questions. It can make them feel cared for.

And I'm not saying anything is wrong with you. Just sharing my perspective.

And I'm a guy, so I guess you'd really be puzzled if we met IRL!

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was just in a group setting where 3 people who all had a tendency for "same sex attraction" described themselves differently.

One individual strongly preferred the term queer.

The second identified as pan because they liked the flag more than the bi flag, but admitted that bi might be a better fit for them.

The third indentified as bi.

The discussion of accurate terminology could be helpful in some settings, but... In casual settings, or even when negotiating intimacy with other people, what YOU mean by the term means more than the term itself, and you are not out of place by feeling "generally fuzzy" on usage.

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 15 points 2 weeks ago

This is challenging to read as a human. And I know I'm not the only one. So if we can't work out all the letters... no way a computer could either. I liken it to the idea that if I type out "detialed", spell check can suggest "detailed", but if I write "ditaled" it's not going to know.

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

When adult men using the urinal allow their pants to fall down around their ankles while peeing

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 4 points 3 weeks ago

We've been called out, but deservedly so.

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 11 points 1 month ago

I second this. Fastmail has been a joy to use. Since the users are paying, the company has (less) incentives to enshittify. JMAP? Count me in!

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 4 points 1 month ago

This was such a helpful little example, thank you! Like a peek into another world.

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Am I crazy? I'm seeing a github page with commits from 6 days ago. When you unmaintained what do you mean, like no new features?

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Love your "moss on building" smudge effect.

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 3 points 4 months ago

With such sharp, acidic wit, you might say the prose is... Lemony.

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 6 points 4 months ago

"He was my fourth cousin, thrice removed. He just couldn't stay away from the bottle and started many brawls at the reunions, baptisms, and funerals."

[–] t_378@lemmy.one 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is a phenomenal resource! In all my years, I haven't actually heard anyone say "once removed" in story telling. I would almost feel weird saying it, despite it being technically correct. It's like saying "whom" out loud, you might be right, but people start mocking you.

Yes I need better coworkers, what are you gonna do...

 

A friend of mine is interested in the "sovereign artist" model, which basically means that you self publish and self release your own work on your own website, as opposed to using a publishing house or art gallery.

It's powerful because it gives everyone a platform to share "niche" art, but as a consumer, it can be difficult to find and "curate" high quality, interesting works of art. Is there a rating/voting system that exists that is resitant to internet vote tampering?

I'm talking about how 10 years ago, Amazon reviews were pretty helpful. But now they've been swarmed with paid and bot written reviews. Same with Slickdeals and many others.

I'd want a voting system that incorporates some ideas:

  • it would prevent one person from making multiple fake accounts
  • reviews wouldn't be suppressed or promoted by paid algorithims
  • the algorithm WOULD help connect people to items they are interested in. But maybe the workings of it would be open source, so it can be audited for bad acting.

Does a project like this exist somewhere? Rather than host that project in one place, it could be powerful to defederate and prevent the temptation to manipulate algorithms.

view more: next ›