Nah dawg it’s the fact that his “incredible solid and well argued” moral framework finds it impossible to unequivocally denounce a fucking genocide that means that maybe it’s not nearly as solid as you say.
swlabr
Not sure on that but I think he’s related to Sabrina Carpenter. Source, this line from Espresso:
I'm working late, 'cause I'm a Singer
mating pool
probably on par with the other stuff you might see at a rationalist poly compound
It’s almost as if the wealthy by and large don’t actually care about doing good or improving society!!!
It’s somewhat non-trivial to create a billionaire, let alone an EA variant; what other ideas do you have for improving EA?
who is this peter singer fellow? Sounds like a great and unproblematic man. Please tell us more of his teachings.
A random thought occurred to me that Veo is probably “better” at being prompted with something like “the scene from X movie but with Y instead of Z” as it is a plagiarism engine first and foremost. I will never investigate this hypothesis, nor will I hold onto it past typing it here.
think of all the rug you could have pulled...
It may be hard to believe but I am not a ‘tech bro’
“If you look closely you might notice I am wearing a fedora, indicating that I am in fact a technology fraternatarian, you peasant.”
Musk objects to the "stochastic parrot" labelling of LLMs. Mostly just the stochastic part.
oh, absolutely. I mean you could sub out "LLM" with any bullshit that management can easily spring on their understaff. Agile, standups, return to office, the list goes on. Management can get fucked
yeah, so we agree, EA, which is predicated on the wealthy actually giving away their money, is a flawed concept as that is something the wealthy cannot be compelled to do without force