sinnerdotbin

joined 2 years ago
[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

People should be educated enough of the pros and cons as much as possible, although that might mean some would get intimidated and refuse to join.

Bingo. Which would you rather do, talk someone's pants off, or scare them off or otherwise have them caught with them down?

Also love your local domain.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I've had a similar idea. Want to race to market? (you'll have a head start, I'm heading into the domain of managing federation block lists next)

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Unfortunately not that easy. There is discussion on solutions. There isn't any now. Platform currently isn't stable enough to respect mutually federated changes all the time.

Also I did put a disproportionate focus on this no take back component, but the scope is wider than that (see comment below about votes being public when almost everyone coming from a monolith assumes it is private)

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Yeah. I can see a case made on either side.

This is the point I am trying to drive home. Even with zero comments, zero posts, you could doxx yourself accidentally with votes alone. You came here from another platform and had a certain expectation of how privacy works here. It does intuitively feel like it should be private.

You are trading some privacy for censorship resistance and community safety in this case, because the goals are different here.

If you trust your admin to keep your IP and email private, and you manage your comments and posts carefully, I encourage you to let your voice be heard and upvote every sinnerdotbin's pantless picture post of the week (just don't like the posts in a different, very small and niche category that can link to you publically as you are the chair of the board at never-nude.social, and there are only 5 members who always like the same posts) . If you are in a country where that support might end with you in a work camp, I'd maybe advise against it in case your local turns out to be a honeypot.

There is a privacy component to federation that the world really would benefit from, but it will be lost if people are not informed. Incredibly private if you are aware how to navigate it. Horrible if you aren't.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Unless a user is viewing from kbin, which interoperates here. It is entirely in view to the kbin UI (and Mastodon I believe).

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's the same camp.

I'm not making the claim other platforms are better because you might be able to slip in a ninja edit before it is captured. I am making the claim that if you are not on high alert here, more than ever, it will bite you.

For better or worse, some people are coming here from other services expecting a measure of control of their data that you don't get here.

The experimental aspect of this space is the other thing I feel warrants more explicit warning about, and noted in my policy template.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Votes are entirely public, Lemmy just made a UI choice not to show them. They show up if someone views it from kbin and ultimately something that could be mined from a self hosted admin.

I think this information may make some of those who profess "everything is saved on the internet and why care change their tune."

Saves I am not sure about yet. Think that may be locals only.

Edit: community subscriptions are another. I believe the admin that hosts the community has access to the sub, but this may also be available to anyone self hosting. Haven't confirmed anything regarding subs yet, maybe that is locals only too.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also USA does have laws regarding site usage by children. Might be more of a TOS thing, but this was brought over from the Mastodon policy I adapted.

IANAL. Especially anywhere near children.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Not saying it is the proper course of action, but no idea where those folks are hosting. EU is not the only place with such laws, and USA is not the only place where hosting is happening. Also highlighted, required or not, privacy policies go a long way to establishing user trust.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Praise your local admins! And help them out by petitioning them to study their local laws and come up with proper policy and TOS statements.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're almost there.

Only if your home server remains unfederated. Even then other users of the server will be able to see everything. And will be more likely to remember, like miss Busy Body.

Uh, a, if not the primary point in my post?

Your IP, your email, will remain at your local if your admin is responsible. If you act to your comfort level in your engagement, you will remain private in the public sphere.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

If you self host, or find an admin you have incredible trust in, you should remain untraceable if you manage your engagement responsibly.

Though another thing I highlight in the policies is this is experimental software. Leaks can and will happen. We have a voice and can play an active part in preserving that privacy.

Recorder is always on by default with your engagement; recorder is always off by default when it comes to things that automatically identify you. It is the opposite in a monolith service.

view more: ‹ prev next ›