shoelace

joined 2 years ago
[–] shoelace@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

It's very inoffensive. That's definitely what they were going for but that also means there's not much to say about it.

[–] shoelace@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (10 children)

It might be harder to pull that off without making the phone thicker in the process, but still possible.

[–] shoelace@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

It's not related to the migration. The article said the lower valuation is as of May 31, before all the backlash on reddit began.

[–] shoelace@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

It drives me nuts about how often I see the comments section of an article have one smartass pasting the GPT summary of that article. The quality of that content is comparable to the "reply girl" shit from 10 years ago.

[–] shoelace@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Gives me Simpsons vibes.

Chalmers: Ah- Aurora Borealis!? At this time of year, at this time of day, in this part of the country, localized entirely within your kitchen!?
Skinner: Yes.
Chalmers: ...May I see it?
Skinner: ...No.

[–] shoelace@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Gonna have to try these out later, thanks!

[–] shoelace@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The concept of "tough love" can mean a lot of different things and dismissing it as having "no value" is painting with too broad a stroke.

In this specific instance, it's helpful because kids need to learn at some point that they can't always cry to get what they want. This absolutely has value because otherwise they continue that behavior as toddlers (and sometimes even past that if you keep enabling them...).

[–] shoelace@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I feel like Lovers gets pretty stressful at times if you're playing 2p. I prefer more chill co-op experiences.