self

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 months ago

pretty much same! I’ve heard good things about some of the games published under Sony, and their umbrella as a publisher still includes excellent studios whose previous games I have very good memories of. but… I just can’t swing the price for a PS5, it really doesn’t feel worth it just for a few games, and I’m not a huge fan of the hardware design. they also seem to have fumbled PSVR2, and I was a big fan of the indie VR scene and how accessible it was on the PSVR1. on top of everything else, I feel like I’ve gotten by far more mileage out of open platforms than I have from any modern console — so for me, just like you, most Sony releases are invisible unless they’re the ones that bomb

[–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Sony (I guess defensible, idk),

their two highest profile failures as of now are Concord, a live service Overwatch clone that was shut down two weeks after launch, and Marathon, an upcoming (or possibly cancelled) Bungie live service Escape from Tarkov clone that doesn’t play well, isn’t anything like the original Marathon games, and infamously has already had several credible accusations of art plagiarism leveled against it. for the latter, I suspect we’ll see a second controversy surface over generative assets; the art that wasn’t plagiarized was starkly ugly and weirdly generic, and I don’t buy that it was that way stylistically.

that shit like this is a normal part of doing business points at a gaming industry that’s rotting at the head, because as unpopular as live service games are, corporations like EA proved they can be very profitable if you tweak the right dopamine receptors to hook enough whales. it’d be nice if EA and Ubisoft were irrelevant now, but unfortunately the industry is still exactly the same exploitative piece of shit they helped make it into. myself and anyone who gives a fuck about quality can keep playing indie games all we want, but these corporations don’t care — they know that a mediocre live service with gambling mechanics will make many times more profit than any indie hit, so they target mediocrity. sometimes they miss and hit rock bottom instead, but who cares? the executives responsible will decimate the studio that developed the game with layoffs or eliminate it entirely, and because capitalism is a death cult that’ll be seen as a win.

[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

if only the industry could be rid of Ubisoft and EA, we could finally play our AAA live service gacha games in peace, without being exploited for money

if only we could go back to the good old days, when the most prominent people in gaming were:

  • the out and proud fascist who runs Epic
  • the out and proud fascists who ran id
  • Todd Howard
  • fucking Peter Molyneux
  • it’s ok, a developer who’s existed since the Amiga days has made a good game!
  • I regret to inform you that the above-mentioned developer has willingly sold their entire studio to EA in exchange for a sack of money and now the sequel is a live service game with gambling mechanics
  • at least we’ll always have the Wing Commander guy. I wonder what he’s up to?
[–] self@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

also:

Russian Spyware now with built in support for fascism. Fucking garbage

it’s fascism except when the exact same backend is used to make the NPCs in my garbage generative games say fash shit, then there’s no harm done

what the fuck even are you

[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

oh wow, the one Gamer who doesn’t hate frame generation for looking like shit has joined the chat

bye bye Gamer

[–] self@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago

I’m heckin’ moving to Switzerland next month holy hell.

that’s seriously amazing! I’m glad you were able to get things going relatively quickly.

[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago

“but why don’t we simply have another LLM check the LLM’s answer” statements dreamt up by the utterly Deranged

But I guess sounding clever is more important on lemmy than being correct.

that explains so much of your post history

[–] self@awful.systems 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

post or DM links if I’m missing something. there’s lots of questionable shit in dragonfucker’s post history, but the fedidrama bits are impossible to follow if you don’t read Lemmy (why in fuck would I, all the good posts are local)

[–] self@awful.systems 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

assuming nonhuman entities are capable of feeling. Enslaving black people is wrong,

yeah we’re done here. no, LLMs don’t think. no, you’re not doing a favor to marginalized people by acting like they do, in spite of all evidence to the contrary. in fact, you’re doing the dirty work of the fascists who own this shitty technology by rebroadcasting their awful fucking fascist ideology, and I gave you ample opportunity to read up and understand what you were doing. but you didn’t fucking read! you decided you needed to debate from a position where LLMs are exactly the same as marginalized and enslaved people because blah blah blah who in the fuck cares, you’re wrong and this isn’t even an interesting debate for anyone who’s at all familiar with the nature of the technology or the field that originated it.

now off you fuck

[–] self@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago (11 children)

sure but why are you spewing Rationalist dogma then? do you not know the origins of this AI alignment, paperclip maximizer bullshit?

[–] self@awful.systems 21 points 2 months ago (15 children)

It’s the alignment problem.

no it isn’t

They made an intelligent robot

no they didn’t

You can’t control the paperclip maximiser with a “no killing” rule!

you’re either a lost Rationalist or you’re just regurgitating critihype you got from one of the shitheads doing AI grifting

[–] self@awful.systems 15 points 2 months ago

“beware, for I am a leader in the Gartner® Magic Quadrant™” is exactly the kind of thing I’d expect an evil wizard to scream moments before I hit him in the head with a mace

 

it’s a short comment thread so far, but it’s got a few posts that are just condensed orange site

The constant quest for "safety" might actually be making our future much less safe. I've seen many instances of users needing to yell at, abuse, or manipulate ChatGPT to get the desired answers. This trains users to be hateful to / frustrated with AI, and if the data is used, it teaches AI that rewards come from such patterns. Wrote an article about this -- https://hackernoon.com/ai-restrictions-reinforce-abusive-user-behavior

But you think humans (by and large) do know what "facts" are?

 

in the least surprising twist of 2023, the ~~extremely mid philosopher~~ visionary AI researcher Douglas Hofstadter has started to voice concerns about chatbots taking over the world

orange site has some takes:

Again, I repeat everyone that is loling at x-risk an idiot and that includes many high profile people with huge egos and counter culture biases. (Hello @pmarca). There is a big movement to call ai doomers many names and generally make fun and dismiss the risk. It is exactly like people laughing at nuclear risks saying its not possible or not a thing even when Einstein and Oppenheimer were warning us. If you belong in this group is up to you.

to quote Major General Thomas Farrell during the Trinity test, “lol. lmao”

gwern in the LW comments:

That is, whatever the snarky "don't worry, it can't happen" tone of his public writings about DL has been since ~2010, Hofstadter has been saying these things in private for at least a decade*, starting somewhere around Deep Blue which clearly falsified a major prediction of his, and his worries about the scaling paradigm intensifying ever since; what has happened is that only one of two paradigms can be true, and Hofstadter has finally flipped to the other paradigm. Mitchell, however, has heard all of this firsthand long before this podcast and appears to be completely immune to Hofstadter's concerns (publicly), so I wouldn't expect it to change her mind.

  • I wonder what other experts & elites have different views on AI than their public statements would lead you to believe?

this is notable as the exact same fucking argument the last flat earther I talked to used, with the words “the firmament” replaced with AI

 

one of hn’s core demographics (windbag grifters) fights with a bunch of skeptics over whether it’s a bad thing the medicine they’re selling is mostly cocaine and alcohol

 

linked to the orange site because there's a funny contrast in the comments between paully's fans who think they've just read the greatest thing imaginable and paully's more jaded fans who want to know why he's posting this when the industry's entering a downturn

view more: ‹ prev next ›