sbv

joined 2 years ago
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

It seems interesting. It's weird that individual feeds don't get their own communities.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

IIRC only individuals can donate federally - organizations might be able to donate, but if they can, the limit is a free thousand bucks.

Companies do work around the limits by getting people to donate (line xEO's families), but those are typically in the tens of thousands, not millions.

The Conservatives recorded 211,000 donors, with an average contribution of around $198. The Liberals received donations from more than 118,000 people who gave $128 on average and the NDP saw almost 60,000 donors chip in an average of $105 each.

From CTV.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Daaaaaaamn

Unfortunately fundraising and a popular leader/message are self reinforcing: mo money means mo ads means mo support means mo money. The Conservatives are snowballing while the other parties aren't even getting their message out.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

I'd love to know why this is getting down votes. It's a weird picture, but the link is interesting.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

Ashton said the NDP has wandered away from its base in favour of messaging with broad political appeal.

He pointed to the party focusing on the cost of groceries instead of improving wages or protecting jobs from automation.

"What are we doing to increase wages? What is the NDP doing to protect jobs?" Ashton said.

Ashton said unionized workers need a more aggressive NDP leader who isn't afraid to vote against the governing party if they advance anti-worker policies.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 25 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We've been in a class war for the past few decades. But at least one of the classes doesn't know/care that it's happening.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is good advice. Ignore your reptilian hind brain and act like the person you want to be.

Yeah, sometimes you'll need to stop and think about your options before making a decision, but you'll be better for it.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Office Space was the first thing I thought of.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can I get this as a perfume? Maybe Axe could do a thing?

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Hey, thanks for taking the time to respond. I'm enjoying this because it gives me a chance to understand my own beliefs. And it's fun to spout off.

Some people believe I shouldn't speak and should only work all day, while others seem to prefer to chat once in a while. For me, it's difficult for me to know the most correct way to act in terms of these two philosophies.

There's no correct answer here. You've expressed a preference for chatting, so let's support that.

We have different [beliefs] and usually that's perfectly ok and I we don't really argue or anything. But sometimes I still do it wrong or say something with too much emotion in my voice or something.

Occasional or friendly disagreement is fine, so long as it doesn't poison the relationship.

Could you pause before replying to sort out your feelings? If you're concerned that you have too much emotion in your voice, that could give you time to notice your emotional state and dial it down. You could even turn the disagreement into more of a joke or quip rather than something heartfelt.

You can use your pause as part of the conversation. Give a thoughtful "huh" or maybe start with a throw away phrase of "I hadn't thought about that" and then pause.

Some people are in a hurry to say their piece - they really wanna get their thought or idea in. In my experience, it's helpful not to do that. It's difficult though.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a fine cat, my dude. He sounds like a treasure.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

woah woah woah this is the internet, we don't do nuance here

/uj thanks for mentioning the self promotion thing. That's a really good point.

 

Did access to healthcare and family doctors come up? The article doesn't mention it.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-five-key-takeaways-from-the-first-ontario-election-debate/

 

This article is deep in "no shit" territory - we've seen lots of chatter about online interference since Trump's first election. The part that's interesting is the call to action

Digital platforms provide unreliable or narrow data on inauthentic behaviour, and they’re not currently required to share any public-interest data with Canadian policy-makers or civil society; combatting online astroturfing will require both increased transparency and platform accountability. Canada should require that these platforms share data with researchers so that the public can understand the prevalence of information threats, and so that policy-makers and civil society can effectively advocate for better digital regulation and platform design.

And the effect of small numbers of users:

We’ve found evidence that very small groups of users are having an outsized impact in online discussions about Canadian elections. In the 2023 Alberta election, just 200 users published 12 per cent of all tweets sent to candidates and political parties. In both the Alberta election and the Toronto mayoral by-election that same year, 50 or fewer users generated over 10 per cent of all abusive content we monitored. These highly active power users (or power abusers) could include high proportions of astroturfers. Regardless of their intentions, granting outsized influence to any very small group of users skews our perceptions of public opinion.

Original: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-is-that-online-outrage-youre-seeing-really-grassroots-or-just/

 

I thought I was being clever, putting the litter box on wheels so I could slide it out from under the stairs, but I have inadvertently created a Mad Max-esque vehicle which my cat uses to roll around the house, dragging himself with his front paws, the entire time shitting.

 

Really interesting op-ed given that Trump was complaining US banks aren't allowed in Canada:

President Donald Trump’s chief economist, Stephen Miran, a Harvard-trained PhD and hedge fund strategist nominated to chair the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, wrote in November “A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System.”

...

He points to the 2018-19 tariffs the first Trump administration imposed on China (and the Biden administration retained) as proof his theory has merit and that it “should inform analysis of future trade conflicts.” In that case the Chinese currency fell, the U.S. dollar strengthened, and the trade deficit remained. But the important thing is that inflation was manageable, China got the message, and new revenue was raised for the U.S. Treasury, according to Mr. Miran.

We will need to come to terms with the fact that the U.S. will assess its relationship with us based on a criteria matrix that includes, as Mr. Miran suggests, if Canada “opens its markets to U.S. firms in the same way America opens its markets to foreign firms operating stateside.”

This has implications for Canadian agricultural supply management, the telecom sector, restrictions on investments, service barriers to online streaming and barriers to digital trade such as the digital service tax.

Original: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-how-are-we-so-befuddled-at-us-tariffs-when-its-all-been-so-obvious/

 

Now that we're talking trade, it works be a good time to address Canada's internal trade barriers:

“Let’s sit down and come up with a list, because everyone wants to protect something – no matter if it’s the dairy cow in Newfoundland, or the wine in B.C., or ourselves – everyone’s guilty,” he added.

Consumers are confronted by these roadblocks every day. A craft brewery in Quebec can’t sell its beer directly to a nearby restaurant in Ottawa. An engineer in New Brunswick has to get licensed in neighbouring Nova Scotia before practising there. A truck driver in British Columbia can only drive certain truck configurations at night but must do so during the day in Alberta – leaving a narrower time frame to make an interprovincial trek.

Taken together, these barriers are constraining Canada’s economic potential. Research shows that tearing them down would give the economy a sizable boost – perhaps enough to offset the hit from steep U.S. tariffs.

Original https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-trump-threats-are-inspiring-canada-to-tackle-trade-war-from-within/

 

I feel like some cancon would have been a better choice for this sentiment.

What is your Canadian choice for this meme?

 

Not directly Canadian news, but given Saturday's events, it's relevant:

Mexico has been preparing possible retaliatory tariffs on imports from the U.S., ranging from 5% to 20%, on pork, cheese, fresh produce, manufactured steel and aluminum, according to sources familiar with the matter. The auto industry would initially be exempt, they said.

15
François Legault sez... (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by sbv@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca
 

I'm waiting for Trudeau's twice delayed press conference. According to Legault, Canada is putting 25% tariffs on some US imports.

Is that legit? Did Legault just scoop Trudeau? I guess we'll find out soonish.

 

As someone who supports the carbon rebate and thinks it's a good policy, I have to admit that Carney is right. Trudeau screwed up the implementation, and now a policy that gives most Canadians more money than they pay is a third rail.

Replacing the tax with something more acceptable, and equally effective seems like a good way forward.

Original: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-mark-carney-consumer-carbon-tax-liberal-leadership-race/

 

I got suckered. I saw some posts about how men don't take care of their skin, and how it has more of an effect as we age. So I thought, what's the harm? Let's give it a try!

Welp, after five days of putting a tiny bit of moisturiser on my face, I have a couple of tiny pimples on my nose. I haven't had zits in decades, and here we are. I stopped applying the moisturiser a couple of weeks ago and I'm still getting those zits.

Thanks skincare.

 

I didn't realize Elon had Canadian grandparents:

Musk’s maternal grandfather, Joshua Haldeman, moved from Canada to South Africa in 1950 because he liked the newly elected apartheid government.

In the 1930s, Haldeman was the Canadian leader of a fringe political movement originating in the US, Technocracy Incorporated, that advocated abolishing democracy in favor of government by elite technicians but which took on overtones of fascism with its uniforms and salutes.

The Canadian government banned Technocracy Incorporated during the second world war as a threat to the country’s security in part for its opposition to fighting Hitler. Haldeman was charged with publishing documents opposing the war and sent to prison for two months.

I don't like associating people with the sins of their ancestors, but Technocracy Incorporated sounds too silly to ignore.

 

I was one of a group of Just Stop Oil activists given the longest-ever UK sentences for peaceful motorway. Six months into my incarceration, this is what I have learned

Not directly related to climate change, but Just Stop Oil has been in the news a lot.

view more: next ›