potustheplant

joined 2 years ago
[–] potustheplant 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But they won’t sacrifice AxB customers to satisfy B customers.

That's the kicker. Adding a headphone jack doesn't mean they have to sacrifice something. They can just do it without having to remove/reduce anything. If adding a jack was really that difficult, something like what you can see in this video wouldn't be possible.

You have to preeeety gullible to believe their reasons for not adding it. The only reason was that they wanted to sell their bluetooth earbuds, that's it.

[–] potustheplant 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They've always made phones...

[–] potustheplant 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Sony Xperia 5V

[–] potustheplant 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I use them and that's more than reason enough to want a reliable, small, cheap, jack that literally has no downsides and lets me use my devices how I want to use them.

[–] potustheplant 2 points 1 month ago

Damn right. LG G5 for example was a pretty interesting concept that could've evolved into something cool.

[–] potustheplant 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Why should they care?

Because they should want to capture more customers? Is that really your question?

The point is, the people who did buy it didn’t care

Yeah and how many were those?

[–] potustheplant 1 points 1 month ago (8 children)

You clearly didn't get the point. The cost isn't the only issue. There are downsides to wireless earbuds and I honestly do not prefer them most of the time. In my example, I'm using them the entire time because I don't want to hear airplane noises and yeah, I am playing something on them most of the time if I'm flying alone.

Also if you’re dropping 10 hour flight money…

Sorry but this is a very very dumb take. "if you spent a lot of money, you could spend MORE money". Really dude? The solution is just having a damn headphone jack, not spending money because corporations want you to.

[–] potustheplant 2 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Let me give you simple example. When I take a flight, I like to watch my own media. Those flights sometimes are upwards of 10 hours. If I use wireless earbuds, both the earbuds and my phone will run out of battery and I have to charge them separately. However, since I have a phone with a headphone jack, my earbuds never run out of battery, I can charge my phone while I'm using them and I don't need to use a single adapter.

Oh yeah, and the audio quality is also better.

[–] potustheplant 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You know why there aren't more users complaining about this? Because they flat out did not buy the device for that reason (e.g. me). Removing the jack is also extremely hyprocritical coming from a "sustainable" company.

[–] potustheplant 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You are completely and utterly wrong. I'm pretty sure that a $700 phone's dac is better than what you can find on a $5 dongle from god knows where. Also, by design there should be no "noise" or "interference" causing issues with the internal dac. If there is, you bought an extremely shitty device.

[–] potustheplant 1 points 1 month ago

It absolutely does not. That's just the stupid propaganda companies distribute to make people buy wireless earbuds.

[–] potustheplant 2 points 1 month ago

Not really, no. There are even people that have been able to ADD a headphone jack to iphones that don't have one.

view more: ‹ prev next ›