justJanne

joined 2 years ago
[–] justJanne@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

NIF can't really ever reach Q>1. All the statements of having reached that only include the energy that reaches the capsule. The energy the lasers actually use is orders of magnitude larger.

This theoretical Q>1, where the plasma emits more radiation than it receives, have been reached by other reactors before.

But while tokamak or stellerator designs need a 2-3× improvement to produce more energy than the entire system needs, the NIF would need a 100-1000× improvement to reach that point, which is wholly unrealistic with our current understanding of physics.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Most fusion attempts try to keep a continuous reaction ongoing.

Tokamak reactors, like JET or ITER do this through a changing magnetic field, which would allow a reaction to keep going for minutes, the goal is somewhere around 10-30min.

Stellerator reactors try to do the same through a closed loop, basically a Möbius band of plasma encircled by magnets. The stellerator topology of Wendelstein 7-X was used as VFX for the closed time loop in Endgame. This complex topology allows the reaction to continue forever. Wendelstein 7-X has managed to keep its reaction for half an hour already.

The NIF is different. It doesn't try to create a long, ongoing, controlled reaction. It tries to create a nuclear chain reaction for a tiny fraction of a millisecond. Basically a fusion bomb the size of a grain of rice.

The "promise" is that if one were to just repeat this explosion again and again and again, you'd also have something that would almost continually produce energy.

But so far, the NIF has primarily focused on getting as much data as possible about how the first millisecond of a fusion reaction proceeds. The different ways to trigger it, and how it affects the reaction.

The US hasn't done large scale nuclear testing in decades. Almost everything is now happening in simulations. But the first few milliseconds of the ignition are still impossible to accurately model in a computer. To build a more reliable and stronger bomb, one would need to test the initial part of a fusion reaction in the real world repeatedly.

And that's where the NIF comes in.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

Haben wir bereits gesehen wie das aussieht, das OVH Feuer war genau ein "was passiert, wenn die billigsten und schlechtesten Akkus die wir kaufen können im billigsten Rechenzentrum ever Feuer fangen".

Viel Rauch, viel Feuer, aber die Umwelt überlebt's und es gibt keinen langfristigen Schaden.

Und wenn man die Zellen halbwegs sinnvoll trennt und halbwegs sinnvolle Brandschutzschotten hat, passiert gar nix. Selbst das Samsung Galaxy Note 7 kriegt man mit einer Alutüte gebändigt.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you actually calculate the maximum speed at which information can travel before causing paradoxes, in some situations it could safely exceed c.

For two observers who are not in motion relative to each other, information could be transmitted instantly, regardless of the distance, without causing a paradox.

The faster the observers are traveling relatively to each other, the slower information would have to travel to avoid causing paradoxes.

More interestingly, this maximum paradox-free speed correlates with the time and space dilation caused by the observers' motion.

From your own reference frame, another person is moving at a speed of v*c. The maximum speed at which you could send a message to that observer, without causing a paradox, looks something like c/sqrt(v) (very simplified).

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Cloudflare actually had to disable them because someone managed to automate them with AI too.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 7 points 2 years ago

I really like portal's absolutely minimal HUD. The game absolutely works without any hud whatsoever just as well too.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

Interesting, from what I can find online even though it's unique to the vita it's still just the memorystick pro duo protocol under the hood, with a DRM system similar to the one Sony uses for their modern CFExpress Type A cards.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey, have you ever met Taylor Swift? I heard she gives great IT security advice over at https://infosec.exchange/@SwiftOnSecurity

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure, it'd be a solution for five minutes until someone delids the secure enclave on the gaming card, extracts the keys, and builds their own open source hw alternative.

High-performance FPGAs are actually relatively cheap if you take apart broken elgato/bmd capture cards, just a pain in the butt to reball and solder them. But possibly the cheapest way to be able to emulate any chip you could want.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's still 8MB for non-nitro users.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I still run the last pre-JS version of the discord app on my phone, and it's sooo much snappier.

[–] justJanne@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Was that the memorystick pro duo, which actually beat even many early UHS-I SD cards at write and read speeds?

view more: ‹ prev next ›