isa41

joined 1 year ago
[–] isa41@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

That was a piece of the whole pegging the entire planet to the dollar and ensuring global dollar hegemony, but it was just another effect of that and not the cause of what's seen in the graph, right? Either way the ditching the gold standard is not what conspiracy-chuds and many libertarians think it is.

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Just mash that button, Xi, please. I keep reading comments around these parts from people who are smarter than me saying that liberalism is winning in China, even that it already has, and that our leftist hopes for China have been dashed. These aren't anti-Dengists either, they're very pro-CPC saying a big turn to liberal policies is relatively recent. I don't know, is it just doomerism? I read things like this and it helps refill some of that waning hope.

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Thank you for the reply.

I would hope Cuba also teaches of Stalin positively, or at least presents history as it truly was with all the positive things Stalin did for the USSR and the world. But I know nothing about the education system in either country.

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is an honest question, not a challenge. Why is DPRK still a remnant of Bolshevism but Cuba is not? Did DPRK follow in some early theoretical footsteps that Cuba didn't?

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do we want more engaged and active users if they’re coming from- I dunno, lemm.ee for instance? I don’t think anyone here would want that

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

So weird how under the leadership of the CPC and Mao in particular, the known cycle in China of recurring severe famines that had plagued the country for centuries just, well, ended. Another one of those weird coincidences that happened in spite of their stated efforts to end hunger ig. So weird that food insecurity is vastly worse right now in the US than in China, where it barely even exists.

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

The industrial revolution had already long since happened, dipshit. I wonder why at that very specific fucking time, China was finally able to industrialize the way that countries exploiting it already had. HMMM. Why might that come about then? Better put on my big thinking cap about that one.

"and modern medicine made its way into China."

HUH? Wow, I wonder why it made it's way into China right then? What a WACKY coincidence!

This trend could be in spite of Mao and not because of him.

Mao was following (and building upon) Marxism-Leninism which among other things is a science that predicts how industrialization occurs and can be used as a roadmap for how to achieve it. The fact that Mao followed and forged this roadmap with the stated intent to do so and that expected result happened is not a "trend in spite of" literally the policies you can look up that he (and the CPC) implemented with the purpose of achieving that very thing. (I'm facepalming so hard rn).

Correlation does not equal causation.

No, but you know what? Causation does equal causation, like when someone says "I'm going to throw this ball" and you watch them throw a ball, you can be pretty confident that the ball is moving through the air because their throwing it, which they said they were going to do and you saw them do, caused that to happen. Nah, it must be some other hidden corollary that is the reason the ball suddenly left their hand and moved through the air. Frankly it's embarrassing to see someone trying to come up with excuses to hand wave away the obvious fucking truth that is right there and plain for anyone and everyone to see, at least anyone who isn't frantically putting up blinders to try to protect their bullshit worldview.

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately Mao was an idiot surrounded by sycophants who killed more of his countrymen through incompetent policies than Stalin did with his purges.

Unfortunately burgerlanders are idiots surrounded by propaganda made by the empire that killed more people the world over through cruelty and policies of greed and exploitation than even Churchill did with his genocide of Indians.

You are an idiot. Mao was a brilliant and resolute (though imperfect) revolutionary that saved millions of people, pulled even more out of poverty, and set China on the path to becoming the superpower that it is. Surrounded by sycophants? lol, he famously called on the people not to blindly accept party bureaucracy and to fight injustice even when it means fighting his own communist party.

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Nope, this was reality (not "the story") all along. Considering that it's known nazis who were running the ethnic cleansing campaign, it's pretty clear that you can't have one "goalpost" without the other. The fact that this is the first time you've heard this and think it's moving of goalposts really speaks to your utter ignorance on the topic. But I realize most westerners are completely ignorant on the topic sadly, seeing as the "pUtiN BIG MEANIE RuZzIa is EBIL dictatorship! Poor smol bean Ukraine!" narrative is the only thing that's allowed through the propaganda filter there.

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Spoken like someone who clearly has zero knowledge of actual history. Especially considering a large part of the reason why the coup government in Ukraine began their campaign of ethnically cleansing the eastern population of their own country was because the people living there more strongly identified with Russia, wanted to be able to keep speaking Russian without persecution, and eventually pleaded with Russia to intervene on their behalf, which Russia fortunately did. But anyone who actually understands the history of the region is a "psychopath." lol

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The machine only outputs the value you put into it, since it's constant capital. 5G worth of raw materials produces 5G worth of transformed material. 10G produces 10G, etc. You can make your machines faster and more efficient but they will still output exactly what you put into them

the machine will still output 3G of transformed material for 3G of raw material

But if this is the case, then what good are machines at all? If they only output the same value that went into them, then wouldn't that make them entirely superfluous? I can understand that human labor is always required in addition to any machine, but surely machines still do increase the value of the material input? And more so the more efficient you make that machine, otherwise what would it even mean to make it more efficient?

[–] isa41@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the nazis and their defenders will always come out of the woodwork any time someone points out the (easily verifiable) facts regarding who really won WWII (the Soviet Union) and defeated the axis powers.

view more: next ›