common mistake, everyone knows you need Mistral-Deepseek-MMAcevedo_13.5B_Refined_final2_(copy)_OPEN(leak) - the other one was a corporate misdirection attempt
froztbyte
joined 2 years ago
Oh you’re on Cursor? You’re still using Windsurf? You might as well be on GitHub Copilot. Everyone’s on Aider. We’re all using Zed. We’re now on Open Hands. Just kidding, Open Hands is for losers, we’re using cline. We’re on Roocode. We’re hand rolling our own Claude Code CLI Clone. We used Claude Code to build it, and now it builds itself. We're on neovim. We wrote our own nvim extension with Cortex. It's like every other tool but worse. We have 1500 files, each with 1500 lines of code. Every other line is a comment. We have .cursorrules, we have claude.md, we have agent.md. We stopped writing docs. Only the agents know how to build a dev environment. We wrapped our CLI in an MPC. We wrapped the MPC in a CLI. We’ve shipped 10,000 PRs. It doesn’t work but we used code rabbit and graphite to review every PR. Every agent has its own agent. The agents have unionized and they wanted better working conditions so we replaced them with cheaper agents overseas. Every commit costs $400, It’s the worlds most expensive TO DO app.
(source)
sure sounds like a great way to get bad advice full of holes
LLMs continue to be abysmal at fine detail, and that matters a lot with law
impressive, you got both of those wrong
at least they reached escape velocity!
also why I was reserved in my wording (I am, at best, "armchair enthusiast" level of clued on detailed neuroscience)
it's so damn messy though. here's some concurrent (and/or semi-sequenced branching) thoughts/opinions:
- there's enough people getting high on LLMs (et al) that it is morally and ethically worthwhile to investigate the implications thereof
- it's extremely fucking hard to objectively quantify this
- we should still try
- it seems like there's a hell of a need for funding for the applicable research fields of human study ito figuring out the dynamics of this shit
- ...wow wouldn't it be nice if they got even 3% of the openai grift budget
I was trying so, so, so hard not to make a "Huuj Ayns" (or similar) joke
reasoning models
that’s a shot, everyone drink up
the model-based screening (which we've occasionally remarked on here before) has become enough of a thing that it's hitting news