dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 1 points 35 minutes ago

I'm not really an accelerationist, but I'll make an exception for this

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

christ. can't he go back to disco, he was good at that

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 14 hours ago

COMMERCIAL NOTICE: Pivot to AI now has T-shirts! yeah, I sorted out Redbubble. Also does mugs and stuff. All proceeds go to a worthy cause, i.e. me.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 2 days ago

you saw nothing

(ty)

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I understand this post is technically illegal in the US

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago

this user is far too informed and knowledgeable to lower himself to educating us peons, and has been guided elsewhere

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

Maxine Waters hates crypto bullshit with the fire of a thousand suns, she's not in power any more but she can help jam this up

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago

when you say "made it", i think FUCKING ROOSE

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

that's CFAR cult jargon right?

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

apparently a complete archive of scott siskind's old livejournal. found on the EA forum no less. https://archive.fo/fCFQx

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 14 points 1 week ago

the user who cannot read has been guided to go not read elsewhere

 

As spotted by @mountainriver

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXc9-oD_iFo - video

 

Thinking about how the arsing fuck to explain the rationalists to normal people - especially as they are now a loud public problem along multiple dimensions.

The problem is that it's all deep in the weeds. Every part of it is "it can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong."

With bitcoin, I have, over the years, simplified it to being a story of crooks and con men. The correct answer to "what is a blockchain and how does it work" is "it's a way to move money around out of the sight of regulators" and maybe "so it's for crooks and con men, and a small number of sincere libertarians" and don't even talk about cryptography or technology.

I dunno what the one sentence explanation is of this shit.

"The purpose of LessWrong rationality is for Yudkowsky to live forever as an emulation running on the mind of the AI God" is completely true, is the purpose of the whole thing, and is also WTF.

Maybe that and "so he started what turned into a cult and a series of cults"? At this point I'm piling up the absurdities again.

The Behind The Bastards approach to all these guys has been "wow these guys are all so wacky haha and also they're evil."

How would you first approach explaining this shit past "it can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong"?

[also posted in sneer classic]

view more: next ›