I think it’s healthy for the fediverse to have similar communities on different instances, because if we centralize, it basically becomes reddit, which means moderation and censorship are at the whims of whoever owns the only place people go.

💯

See also this blog post discussing this issue and some of the proposed improvements: https://popcar.bearblog.dev/lemmy-needs-to-fix-its-community-separation-problem/

I like their proposed solution #3, but it is somewhat hampered by the DNS-centric model of ActivityPub. I hope that one day something like this proof-of-concept of making AP content-addresable (which i found via this post about "How decentralized is Bluesky really?") will be widely adopted and make instances less important.

But even without such a major change as moving to content addressability, that blog's proposed solution #3 (simply letting communities "follow" other communities) would let readers pick which moderation they like without posters needing to manually cross post to reach everyone: If communities A and B could mutually follow eachother, posts would by default appear on both but could be independently removed from either. 🤔

Good question.

I see that the file served from https://packages.mozilla.org/apt/repo-signing-key.gpg is the same as the file at https://packages.cloud.google.com/apt/doc/apt-key.gpg

Apparently Mozilla outsources the operation of the Firefox APT repo to the Google Cloud "Artifact Registry" service 😦

A lot of people commenting on this seem to have gaps in their knowledge of what happened

We're in a Linus-email-🍿-thread, so that kind of goes without saying doesn't it? 😂

What does glazer mean in this context? (English is my fourth language)

English is my first language and I also wondered. The definition in the other reply to you was only added to wiktionary last year. According to know your meme, it became popular on TikTok in 2023 and allegedly originated on discord in November 2021.

(wiktionary also has another definition which I've also never heard of before which has been there since 2007 with no quotations or other evidence of actual use...)

I tried giving them some other species

👍

would you recommend that book for learning regular expressions as a non CS guy?

Absolutely, it's an excellent book which I highly recommend.

The latest edition (3rd) is almost 20 years old, but I don't think regex has actually changed substantially since then so it should still be very useful. (I read the 2nd edition cover-to-cover and enjoyed it enough that I bought the 3rd when it was released 😀)

If you're going to buy a physical copy from amazon you should use the author's link here to give him slightly more money for it. But if you just want a PDF I see one is available here.

short answer: because nobody flagged that other one. (it is deleted now too.)

re: riseup, is it even possible to use their VPN without an invite code? (i don't think it is?)

in any case, riseup says clearly that their purpose is "to provide digital self-determination for social movements" - it is not intended for torrenting, even if it might work for it.

feel free to PM me if you want to discuss this further; i am deleting this post too. (at the time of deletion it has 8 upvotes and 33 downvotes, btw.)

This headline and article are focused on antidepressants, but the line which mentions them in the executive order which this reporting is based on is actually broader.

It also seems to attribute the authorship of the executive order to Kennedy, linking to it while saying that he "issued a statement", despite it not actually mentioning his name and it being phrased in the first person from the president (beginning with "By the authority vested in me as President" as is usual for an executive order).

The article says (emphasis mine):

The government, he said, would “assess the prevalence of and threat posed by the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, [and] mood stabilizers.”

While the executive order says:

(iii) assess the prevalence of and threat posed by the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, stimulants, and weight-loss drugs;

Great article, BTW

I disagree, the headline is clickbaity and implies that there is some ongoing conflict. The fact that the Fedora flatpak package maintainer pushed an update marking it EOL, with "The Fedora Flatpak build of obs-studio may have limited functionality compared to other sources. Please do not report bugs to the OBS Studio project about this build." in the end-of-life metadata field the day before this article was written is not mentioned until the second-to-last sentence of it. (And the OBS maintainer has since said "For the moment, the EOL notice is sufficient enough to distance ourselves from the package that a full rebrand is not necessary at this time, as we would rather you focus efforts on the long-term goal and understand what that is.")

The article also doesn't answer lots of questions such as:

• Why is the official OBS flatpak using an EOL'd runtime?
• Why did Fedora bother to maintain both their own flatpak and an RPM package of OBS?
• What (and why) are the problems (or missing functionality) in the Fedora Flatpak, anyway? (there is some discussion of that here... but it's still not clear to me)
• What is the expected user experience going to be for users who have the Fedora flatpak installed, now that it is marked EOL? Will it be obvious to them that they can/should use the flathub version, or will the EOL'd package in the Fedora flatpak repo continue to "outweigh" it?

Note again that OBS's official flathub flatpak is also marked EOL currently, due to depending on an EOL runtime. Also, from the discussion here it is clear that simply removing the package (as the OBS dev actually requested) instead of marking it EOL (as they did) would leave current users continuing to use it and unwittingly missing all future updates. (I think that may also be the outcome of marking it EOL too? it seems like flatpak maybe needs to get some way to signal to users that they should uninstall an EOL package at update time, and/or inform them of a different package which replaces one they have installed.)

TLDR: this is all a mess, but, contrary to what the article might lead people to believe, the OBS devs and Fedora devs appear to be working together in good faith to do the best thing for their users. The legal threat (which was just in an issue comment, not sent formally by lawyers) was only made because Fedora was initially non-responsive, but they became responsive prior to this article being written.