baxster

Somsagt är inte ett dugg förvånad, det är inte första gången polisen går ut o varnar om tex signal. För typ 1 år sedan gick det ut o sa att bara kriminella använder appar dom signal.

Skrev ett inlägg till polisen o tacka dom för att jag nu vet om att jag och hela min familj och vänner var kriminella och att det var skönt att veta vilket fack man va i. Svaret blev en ursäkt och att de visa sig att polisen som svara också använde signal.

Till skillnad mot polisen så uppmuntrar jag mina barn till säker kommunikation 😊

Thanks for the input and i will look into it again because I really like the idea. Can I send you a DM if I run in some problems along the way?

Today i have a torrenting server. A headless ubuntu server with qbittorrent-nox tjat i acccess via a webbroswer. I have trouble setting up the same with i2p (haven't looked at it super much). I get torrenting over ipsnark on my PC to work but the headless webui i2p torrenting I don't get to work. Especially when I whant to surf i2p with the same router that I torrenting over. The goal is to have it in docker.

One more problem I always get is that I am always "firewalled" when I search some people say open ports in router and other say don't.

Thanks for the tip! I use pihole and been using it for years so the blocking part is already taken care of😊

Now i am going to set up unbound. I am sick of DNS blocking...

I boken "bekvämlighetens tyranni" så säger de att enbart 1177 betalade bann-id's driftskostnader för flera år under corona pandemin, alla satt och logga in för se om deras testresultat hade kommit in.

Ja Gunnar strömmer är ett av de största hoten mot demokratin vi har haft. Jag börjar på riktigt tycka att det börjar bli ganska läskigt med vad som läggs fram. Om 30,40 kanske 50 år så kommer folk säga "vad var det som hände, när gick det så snett? " då kommer jag att peka på dessa tider

Coolt! Tackar:)

I understand what you mean and can agree with you to some extent. It is good in that it clearly helps to counter extremism.

The problem I see is when a party can be against backdoors when they talk about elections for the country and then vote yes in the EU. Then comes "defense" – now we are no longer talking about the country but the entire EU, and these are two different things.

I also don't quite understand what you mean by "all-in" voting.

I hope they will take privacy seriously. I don't think they will. Poland has a new proposal that doesn't seem to be liked by the Council of Ministers. If chat control goes through, I believe it will break with previous laws and regulations "for the greater good."

Yes know that it is different instances. But encryption becomes more and more an hot topic. And the split between EU, government, Law enforcement authorities and the military is concerning.

We vote on the "big" parties of our country's and the same party that says no to backdoors I'm the government can say yes in EU and vice versa.

So what I really want to say is if we can't agree on what we want's it's going to result in bad and weird laws. We can't say yes and no at the same time.

I hope you get what I mean..

So they havet changed their mind about chat control? You can't say yes and no at the same time.

Verkligen, det är upp till dig själv o välja om du vill ha det eller inte. Helt rätt o jag har inget ont att säga om det.