bastion

The best advice was gratuitous.

good looking out.

you know, you could also either include a lossy copy next to the lossless ones, then rsync only lossy extensions, or, if that pollutes your collection, have a separate but identically-structured directory tree, where all your lossless files have lossy copies. Then, you can rsync both folders (send-only) to your single remote (lossy extensions only).

but, yeah, Git really isn't the tool for this, agreed.

the car is already purchased. the debt is to the bank. not making payments is irrelevant.

It's you, not them.

Make a script. I'd use xonsh or python with sh.py.

• create a dict for remote to local filename map
• walk your local collection
  • for each file, determine what the correct remote name (including a valid extension) would be, and add the pair to the dict, with remote filenames as keys, local filenames as values
• make a set like local_munged_names from that dict's keys
• walk your remote tree, and store the filenames in a set like remote_names
• names_to_upload = local_munged_names - remote_names
• for each name in names to upload, look up the local filename from the remote to local filename map. Then, encode it if it needs encoding, and upload.

Yes, because

In the first kind of language, the thought process is basically: I have the flow of execution, starting at the top of the file. If I want to make a library, I should build the things I want to build, then get out of the way.

Note the "I have the flow of execution", and the "if I want to build a library".

If you just want to build an executable, do as you wish, you already have the flow of execution.

If you want to build a library, make the relevant classes and functions and get out of the way (i.e., no IO, no long-running tasks).

If you want to combine them, use the main name check - or, make a package and do entry points that way. Either way works, because both can fulfill the goal of staying out of the way of those importing this as a library.

well.. >.>

oh. I never really thought of myself as diabolical. Since I guess by that definition I am, maybe I should learn Python.

indeed.

It simply swaps some things around to make things more confusing, then goes into an infinite loop (whether or not you import or execute it standalone). it's no different than just including in the global scope:

while True:
    pass

I was kinda lazy with the fuckery, tbh. I could have gotten much more confusing, but don't have too much time today. :-)

Maybe I should do a post in programmer humor about preventing arbitrary execution of your python code, and make it sound like it prevents security flaws. ..which, technically, it does - if your code isn't executing, and instead a useless infinite loop is executing, there's nothing to exploit.

came here to see if Fedora had a --download-only equivalent.