absolutejank

joined 2 years ago
[–] absolutejank@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

yeah pretty much. sometimes i feel like the only thing standing in the way of a job that could serve as an entry point into IT/software engineering is me. but i’ve tried everything and have gotten nothing but radio silence and rejections. i developed personal projects, cleaned up my linkedin page, networked with others that happened to be in the field when i worked retail, revised and revamped my resume several times over. my standards were low to begin with, now they’re below the floor. nothing’s come of it. i don’t know what the secret sauce is. i really don’t know what else there is to do besides succumb to neetdom and chronic dependence. my stupid ass applied for a master’s program too, i guess i’m hoping that things are somehow better once i’m finished with that. or so that i can keep telling myself that i’m the one in control lmao.

[–] absolutejank@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

to give an answer to a rhetorical question: because firing people based on weight is a can of worms being opened. while it's still technically not illegal to fire someone because their weight makes them "unfit," the ada can be invoked if said obesity is caused by a disorder (e.g., type 1 diabetes). this ignores the fact that it's hard to prove that someone would be unfit just for their weight; it just opens up employers to lawsuits. a simpler way to think about it would be to ask yourself if the guy handing out speeding tickets is "unfit for duty" solely because he's obese.

[–] absolutejank@lemmy.world 96 points 1 week ago (5 children)

who the fuck asked for this

[–] absolutejank@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I disagree pretty hard on this. Oliver Anthony and my views on corruption at the federal level don't align whatsoever, even if we ultimately end up with nearly the same conclusion. He spends more time blaming people on welfare for the struggles of other working-class people without providing a reason why they're responsible. And where he could spend time deriding politicians for accepting corporate buyouts to strengthen their iron grip on the working class, he simply says politicians ignore the working class because they're too busy visiting Epstein island. Which, while not wrong, ultimately ignores that politicians are corrupt due to corporate buyouts - a consequence of capitalism. It's a song - sure, maybe nothing's literal. But I don't consider Oliver Anthony's views and my own views to be compatible, even if we end up with near the same conclusion.

Additionally, I would urge others to not feel like they must accept others' viewpoints just because they end up near the same place, because co-opting the language and causes of the left is a legitimate tactic the far right uses to gain legitimacy. Think of how TERFs co-opted the feminist movement to make their hatred of trans people sound like it's coming from a place of "feminist consciousness." Songs like "Rich Men North of Richmond" do the same thing, but they'll make it sound like a burning hatred of "the undeserving" (coming from the pot shots at people on welfare) comes from a place of class consciousness.