After three decades in prison?
I guess you're a big fan of life sentences?
I'm not sure if America is capable of producing good news these days, and I'm not sure this fits either. To me it reads like just another story of "US justice system is fucked, every instance of justice boils down to the whims of some random judge"
Haha, fair enough - I just figured if anyone had any idea it would be one of you guys. :) @BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de @irelephant@calckey.world @jwr1@kbin.earth
The link doesn't seem to work for those who are not signed in as users.
Try this: https://sopuli.xyz/post/27371098
It wasn't last time I checked, but now it is. Maybe there is some delay.
Still not on PieFed though.
And then you're on your phone, and typing two spaces at the end of each line is a mess because your keyboard insists you really want punctuation and a space. Because why would you end a sentence with two spaces. Gah.
Wow - this is not particularly uplifting stuff in terms of interoperability. At least I guess it's not (primarily) a problem with the Bluesky bridge...
https://lemmy.world/post/28639157 https://piefed.social/post/689367 @irelephant@calckey.world
@BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de & @jwr1@kbin.earth : do you know what is going on here? We were testing interoperability between an mbin magazine and Mastodon/Bluesky, and it turns out not none of the comments make it over to Lemmy or Piefed.
Og om det betyr at ikke alle kan ha egen hytte så er det fordi det strengt talt ikke er bærekraftig at alle kan ha sin egen hytte. Om man er avhengig av vei, innlagt vann, offentlig kloakk, og innlagt strøm, er man kanskje ikke helt så avhengig av å ha en egen hytte i fjellet likevel.
I get the pleasure of hanging out in well moderated communities where I feel like I am doing my part. Doesn't need to be more complicated than that.
Of course politics is about prioritization. But some things are not politicized as we all seemingly agree it should be prioritized, like military in America.
Climate is so highly politicized because one side is refuting basic facts. They are shouting loud about it and running their propaganda, making the issue politicized. This does not seem to have happened that much in this campaign, as they are focused on other things.
For better or for worse, depending on who wins. I'm just arguing that politicization of climate is not inherently a good thing; rather, in an ideal political situation, it shouldn't be politicized at all at this point.
I'm not passing blame, I'm just saying it might be good for it to be depoliticized a bit. Especially if it involves those more willing to act on climate actually winning.
Whichever policies work well should ideally be more of an academic/technical debate rather than a political one.
It requires political action, but this could happen without politicizing it.
If politicians recognize the need to do something, they might do it even if they do not center their campaign around it.
German support for Ukraine was in a similar situation. Though parties had different ideas and the election would very much be decisive for the future direction, support for Ukraine was not particularly politicized in the election - they focused more on other issues. In the end actors supportive of Ukraine won though, and now they are offering their support without having politicized the issue.
Fair enough - it can be a good thing without being particularly good news.