Wolf314159

joined 1 year ago
[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 1 points 5 days ago

I can't tell if you're making a very subtle joke with a straight face and your tongue in your cheek or if you really haven't actually read the book. The irony is just fucking delicious. I prefer S. Morgenstern's original text.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, absolutely no existential dread from the Cold War. And we all just instantly stopped believing that the world would end in a nuclear holocaust just because the Soviet Union collapsed. Then there was the Gulf war, then 9/11, then another Gulf war. And we've known about climate change and how capitalism is killing our planet for practically the entire time, that's not new. Oil crisis? That's been a slowly building crescendo of apocalypse since like the 70s.

I'll buy existential dread as an excuse for not wanting to breed, not as an explanation for teenagers being less horny.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bicycles (and electric scooters) are vehicles that should also be following the same rules as car, i.e. not driving the wrong way down a one way street and not bombing down the sidewalk. I mean, I still look both ways, but that's because people are dumb maniacs on the road, not because bicycles.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can you still buy a star? Obviously dubious that you actually own it. But certainly bigger than anything on earth and a bit tricky to deliver.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago

That's fair. Never really had any attachment to the comic character myself, just enjoyed the 90s blockbuster craziness. Serious, it absolutely is not.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 14 points 1 week ago

He was TOO good at the satire. On the left dum-dums thought he was actually right, while on the right dum-dums thought he was on their side.

Also, I think people are hitting their limit of joking about the collapse of democracy and civil society. I know I am. I know there are now movies, TV, and books that I might have found interesting in less interesting times; now it all just hits too close to home. John Oliver can hit those "too close to home" topics and move on to other things. But it always felt like when Colbert was doing his conservative pundit schtick, he was trapped in it. It was harder to laugh along with him about other things that weren't specifically about that kind of satire. He might have had some more material of a particular idiom if he'd stuck with it, but that idiom can wear thin.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Those are fighting words. New Dredd has no riz.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aggressive is modifying "virtue signaling". I guess I could have been more clear by adding an "ly" to make it clear that aggressive was an adverb.

But, honestly in my experience there is ALWAYS someone finding some new way to understand your comment so that they have something to argue with. I was both making a joke AND making a point. Complicated, I know.

And it is something to criticize: OP asked about "X", commenter replied about NOT "X".

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Karl Urban fucking nailed it in the first one

No, that was the reboot. You kids already forget about Stallone?

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I downvoted your comment because it's doesn't really add anything to the conversation, it's just aggressive virtue signalling.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, I'm aware. I don't really disagree in general, but that dependency on devices is problematic. Also, I think that dependency is almost entirely a fiction. The only vendors I've ever met that don't take cash, weren't selling anything I'd generally need in an emergency or miss if I couldn't get it immediately, e.g. craft/art fair vendors and fly by night food trucks. And I mostly managed to navigate everywhere without a map, even though I kept one in the glove box. The U.S. (I assume we're talking about the U.S. because carbrained) is fairly easy to navigate without either as long as you can find a highway and you can read road signs. Maps helped sometimes sure, but the lack of one never made me feel unsafe. Sure, things can go badly, but that's due to a lack of ingenuity and knowledge (street smarts as we used to call it), not the lack of a phone. In fact, I've gotten just as lost while looking at a map and trying to follow a friend's directions. Maps, physical or digital, are almost always wrong or outdated to some degree.

You're only as dependent on your phone as you make yourself. That crutch is the real danger.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's amusing to me that the very idea of leaving the house without your cellphone is seen as very dangerous. But I guess payphones and landlines at every tiny shred of civilization aren't really a thing anymore. Nobody could track me and I could get genuinely stranded occasionally for the first few decades on my life, but I never felt that lifestyle was dangerous. Just raw dogging life before it was cool I guess.

view more: ‹ prev next ›