TurtleOnASkateboard

joined 3 months ago
 

Not a good title.

A disaster film set during the 2018 Kerala Floods where people from all walks of life faced catastrophic consequences and put in collective efforts to survive the calamity.

8.3 on IMDB

On the Pirate Bay but you have to search for '2018.Everyone.Is.A.Hero.2023'

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 15 points 13 hours ago (7 children)

It's a weird lacuna of the English language, there's no official word for estadounidense.

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 days ago

just negotiate a peace already ffs

 

Chronicles the trial of Goldman, a French left-wing revolutionary who was convicted of several robberies and was mysteriously murdered.

Available in the usual places

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pyongyang is not North Korea. It’s a Potemkin village designed to present a false image to the rest of the world.

You are going down a rabbithole of increasingly improbable beliefs. First you say hotdogs are banned; then you support that by saying sushi is banned; then you support that in turn by saying that a city my friends have been to is a lie. This city.

Surely at some point you'd realise, "Wait I've been fed lies." Nobody can seriously believe that Pyongyang is a propaganda piece.

Reminds me of the Wikipedia edit war where people were trying to claim that a shared bicycle scheme "is propaganda".

 
  • Lying leads to a huge mess, don't start

  • When you start lying, you're not good at it yet

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

In the linked DW-article it says the administration hired/fired stuff. Which is arguably different then them doing it directly, although that is a bit pedantic I guess

Look the the headline of the thread we are in. It begins KIM JONG-UN BANS HOTDOGS

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

a well-documented history of atrocities and bizarre, freedom-limiting proclamations..... it's well-known for banning foods that it considers contrary to its culture, such as sushi

"well-documented".... then a link to worldpopulationreview.com without a mention of their source??

You are coming across as someone who believes things they read on the internet.

People have done a good job in the more upvoted comments of showing you why you're jumping to conclusions, but you keep doubling down like you have something to prove.

Here's Vice saying many Pyongyang residents love sushi.

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The point made was probably that it is ironic you wold use them as a source for RFA being government-founded insinuating that makes them inherently biased.

He didn't claim that tho? DW started being discussed here – https://lemmy.world/comment/14345095 – where it talks about Trump/Biden hiring/firing staff at US Agency for Global Media (USAGM).

Are you saying Trump/Biden did not in fact hire/fire staff at US Agency for Global Media (USAGM)?? Coz that's the only reason you'd bring up DW's credibility. Otherwise you're just diverting.

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The comment thread from this point down is useless.

Source for anti-vax claim?

You do know where DW, the one source you provide, gets its money?


There, wasn't that easier than debating "whose job" it is to look up Wikipedia?

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

And none of them back those claims up.

"those claims" meaning that RFA is linked to US intelligence/politics?

Are you saying RFA isn't a branch of US interests? I have never heard anyone make that claim before.

See 1st paragraph: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Agency_for_Global_Media

38north.org is a pretty decent source on North Korean news.

Or actually attack the credibility of the story.

You have the burden of proof backwards: WHY would anyone believe that "hot dogs are banned in North Korea". It simply makes no sense. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

There's no reason to think the story is credible. I've searched it and it appears RFA posted it in November, then The Sun picked it up 3 days ago. Then various repeaters.

 

Media in French is fine.

Also, is it pro-rich / pro-cop?

My understanding is the guy inherits billions but he's from the criminal classes and hates the upper-classes.... not really sure what class message is being sent

view more: next ›