Thorry84

Why do you think that? I think the new leadership is trying to bring stability to the team. Lawson is at the same performance level in the RB as Tsunoda was. The Red Bull car has a very narrow operating window and suits the driving style of Verstappen. Everyone else has a really hard time getting anything out of that car. It takes time to get close to the level of Verstappen and it's hard to get there when the car doesn't perform at all unless you are near his level.

This isn't new, we've seen cars like this in the past. I remember the Ferrari car being a handful back in the day. When Massa was injured in 2009 and had to step out for a while, nobody could drive his car. They tried Luca Badoer, who was very experienced driving the car in the simulator, but was dead slow in the real car. They then pulled in Fisichella, who did pretty well as teammate to Alonso at Renault and had a pole position and podium with Force India that year. He was nowhere in the Ferrari, I don't think he scored a single point. Whilst Raikkonen was fighting at the front regularly in the same car.

Checkmate liberals

I don't know, I feel like saying 'kagis' makes you streets ahead of the rest.

This race was boooooring. When it was a little bit wet there was some action, especially by Ham because he started so far back. But after the first round of pitstops it became boring real fast.

Ver could do nothing to Lec, he couldn't get close and even if he could the top speed of the Ferrari was such DRS wasn't enough to get him by on the straight.

Bor was all like "Let me by bro, why isn't he overtaking?" only to get stuck in the exact same place, not even getting into DRS range. Hul gave up and tried to do something with a pitstop, only to end back on the end of the train instead of in front of it.

Surely they had data from yesterday showing the deg on the mediums to be really low? It wasn't that big of a stretch to think Pia could easily make it on the mediums. Conditions were a bit different from yesterday, but I feel like the temperature being lower and the speeds being down would make the tyres degrade less, not more?

Then with 3 laps to go, Nor gaining 0.8 sec on Pia and being almost 5 secs behind him. Let me just do some quick maths... yeah no he ain't making it. But the commentary was going full COPIUM: "This is going to be epic you guys." Well no, even if somehow Nor got close, nobody was able to overtake at all. Let alone on super old tyres with the track being damp off-line.

They should have started the race so much earlier. The radar showed it being clear from 16:00, they just should have started then. Not all those laps behind the safety car. Once they get up to speed, they clear the track very quickly. Going slow behind the safety car doesn't help for shit.

I get Spa is special in how dangerous it is, especially the Kemmel straight that doesn't dry quickly and Dilano van 't Hoff being killed there just a few years ago. But at this rate they could better just not race at Spa, when it's dry it can get pretty boring and if it's wet it's too dangerous?

I did enjoy that tractor going down the straight at top speed tho, that was cool.

SOURCE!?!?!?!

My pussy

And my crack

Is this going to be improved with the 2026 aero?

Back in the day they would just go racing, but it did lead to some big crashes. But if the alternative is no racing at all, that's not right as well. Is there a middle ground?

Not below average dev necessarily, but when posting code examples on the internet people often try to get a point across. Like how do I solve X? Here is code that solves X perfectly, the rest of the code is total crap, ignore that and focus on the X part. Because it's just an example, it doesn't really matter. But when it's used to train an LLM it's all just code. It doesn't know which parts are important and which aren't.

And this becomes worse when small little bits of code are included in things like tutorials. That means it's copy pasted all over the place, on forums, social media, stackoverflow etc. So it's weighted way more heavily. And the part where the tutorial said: "Warning, this code is really bad and insecure, it's just an example to show this one thing" gets lost in the shuffle.

Same thing when an often used pattern when using a framework gets replaced by new code where the framework does a little bit more so the same pattern isn't needed anymore. The LLM will just continue with the old pattern, even though there's often a good reason it got replaced (for example security issues). And if the new and old version aren't compatible with each other, you are in for a world of hurt trying to use an LLM.

And now with AI slop flooding all of these places where they used to get their data, it just becomes worse and worse.

These are just some of the issues why using an LLM for coding is probably a really bad idea.

Looks like someone has a case of the Mondays!

That's still very cheap, the 1€-Store near me has almost nothing at 1€ anymore. It's become more like the 5€ store.

I'll check on it after a nap

In the last couple of seasons it was very heavily implied Carter and O'Neill were dating. She took a different position to be outside the chain of command from O'Neill so they were finally free to pursue their relation.