is the new pope taking the name leo suggestive that this would be forthcoming?
i'm not at all familiar with church politics, but it might seem like there isn't a need to reiterate a distributivist vision when there's no effective voice for labor that's seen in need of being moderated.
he publicly rejected Vance's defense of Ordo Amoris -- that's something. but doesn't appear that he's a liberation theologian or anything.
and as @funkystuff implies, taking the name leo suggests probably a renewed articulation of Catholic social thinking.