I dont get it - are you trying to mimic vm’s with you docker containers? docker works great using the normal way of exposing ports from the internal docker net through the host. Making technology work in ways it wasnt designed for usually gives you a hard to maintain setup
Oisteink
You have a mighty big hand if you reach l and a with the same one
I must have been doing websites wrong for decades by not forwarding through a reverse proxy. I admit a good one like caddy makes tls easy, but unless you have several backends for one site theres no need. The reverse proxy part of load balancer is very similar to a port forward, but on layer 7 instead of 3 or 4
There are other things to consider as well. Nfsv3 is good for large sequential reads/writes. There are no multichannel in nfs3 and no caching , and you should adapt technology to the use-case. For vm storage nfs sucks while for movie storage it works great.
For general file storage I would pick smbv3 for speed and ease of user/security
Multicast DNS uses multicasting (surprise!) so keep your devices on the same network and it just works. Docker is not very multicast friendly but lxc or a vm should have no issues.
There are two countries in eu that has troops to deploy: france and uk. The rest of us have defence forces only
They are dismantling the US to make sure nobody needs to vote anymore. They dont need the us to keep current status quo. Its not relevant for their goal
If you really want an accurate test go for a mensa test. But you should probaby familiarise yourself on what the test can measure. And to put this into a work context is mostly useless. You do not need 140 iq to be a lawyer. You do not need 120 iq to write code. You do not need 100 iq to do investment banking.
You can already reflash a lot of devices for this purpose. And you could use esp-home to customise once reflashed