Oisteink

joined 2 years ago
[–] Oisteink 2 points 3 months ago

It always predicts the next word based on its tokenisation, data from training and context handling. So accuracy is all there is.

[–] Oisteink 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Theres a subscription for this that works kinda like that.

Otherwise a vpn into your hone network gives you access from your devices. Maybe your router already supports this, otherwise tailscale or zerotier and similar can be a good solution.

I dont have issues exposing my ha to the internet through caddy, but i filter traffic based on country of origin (geoip2). Used to have separate auth in front but i removed that a few months ago

Edit: not too much use of running two containers if you expose the same storage to both. Better option would be to have two reverse proxies, one for local and one for internet, both proxyinf the same ha instance. That way you can get ha on normal https port with certs.

Imo you are pretty safe with a reverse proxy with an extra layer of security.

[–] Oisteink 1 points 3 months ago

No - i would advocate for not using docker if I need a network interface. But thats my opinion, and others will have a different one.

You can use macvlan networking, and if you need host<->container communication you give your host a macvlan interface instead or in addition to the root nic. Macvlan works “on top of” an existing interface, so theres no routing locally between the underlying nic and the macvlan nics.

If the host have several nic’s you can pass one through to a given container

[–] Oisteink 7 points 3 months ago

Seems to work fine for those you listed. They wanted people to use their services directly and that’s what they get. It was never about making money off the api, it was about limiting api usage

[–] Oisteink 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There are other solutions than docker for that use-case that I think are better fits. It probably works fine, but for me other drivers including host mode and ipvlan seems to have been introduced to solve the wrong thing. Like how it needs privilege for them to work and how it exposes the containers network interface. For me it kinda breaks parts of why i would use docker.

Its my personal opinion and how i like to work.

You could probably make your setup work but it seems too complicated for me when you introduce a bridge as the root interface. Maybe with macvlan adapters on the host instead or in addition.

[–] Oisteink 9 points 3 months ago
[–] Oisteink 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Halo 1 and 2

[–] Oisteink 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

People are misled by the name. Its not making stuff up, its just less accurate

[–] Oisteink 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Esp-home also works with the older esp-01 - it was released as a wifi module so there are only two gpio’s, but thats enough for a lot of home automation stuff.

Here’s one i have connected to HA, where HA uses rest-api to capture some data from a game called tacticus, and it shows my available tokens for guild raid and arena

[–] Oisteink 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Heres the top google link i found: https://randomnerdtutorials.com/how-to-flash-a-custom-firmware-to-sonoff/

Esp-home is available as a HA addin, docs here: https://esphome.io/

[–] Oisteink 85 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Too much fanfare and too little real info shared to be of any value. Sounds more like an ad than infosec

[–] Oisteink 10 points 3 months ago (6 children)

You can already reflash a lot of devices for this purpose. And you could use esp-home to customise once reflashed

view more: ‹ prev next ›