What evidence do you have to back up that claim?
Nash42
joined 2 years ago
Be sure you read their terms regarding external or network-connected drives. I remember something about them not allowing some form of drive external to your computer (because otherwise you could back up several computers, when they want you to pay $20/mo per computer)
Wonderful input, thank you. As far as I'm aware, because we haven't had NN, the downside we've seen is ISPs counting data usage for streaming, e.g., Netflix toward a user's monthly data usage, whereas they wouldn't count data usage count if the user was streaming from the ISP's own streaming service.
This leads me to believe Netflix, Disney, and the swath of companies who provide streaming services, but not their own ISP, may be, indeed, a proponent of NN.
I can see how, with the combination of ISPs losing money due to implementing that patchwork of "Internet laws", and other non-ISP-providing streaming service companies losing money to a lack of NN, we may see NN codified into law. But, to get there, things have to get worse first, no?
Can the FCC be influenced by donations from private interests? Is there any sway congress can impose upon the FCC?
If your elitedesk can fit two drives and has a USB slot, honestly just a flash drive with a bootable Linux image. The 'dd' command has the capability to copy one drive to another
To add to Unnamed Reverse Engineering Podcast,
Embedded.fm @ https://embedded.fm/
The Amp Hour @ https://theamphour.com/
Both podcasts have regular interviews with industry folks and "just two folks chatting about their subject" episodes
Yes, it's been a problem for me too. Trying to ranged-attack an enemy, quickly enough that I didn't notice I was accidentally attacking the myrm, but visually it looked obvious my cursor was far enough away from the myrm as to not be targeting it
Out of office
Turning right, looking at the top of the clock, is different from turning right while looking at the bottom of the clock. And so on.
Really enjoying the app! It has left a great impression after an ~hour of use
view more: next ›
Agreed and well-put. Lack of evidence cannot give creedence to a claim. It's all well and good to believe in (the absence of, or possibility of) supernatural being(s), but to state such beliefs as objective is not follow the scientific method.