LovingHippieCat

joined 2 years ago
[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Didn't know that, I'll edit the comment, thanks for the info!

Edit that I hope I made in time for you to see: does that mean that the parties that are under 5% are waisted votes? So does the percentage of vote total show that the country is majority left leaning but because so many voters voted for parties that didn't break 5 those voters won't be represented and the seats that would have gone to leftist parties if they had broken 5 will go to the center left party who did? Basically, is voting for parties who don't break 5 like Americans voting for Third parties, completely pointless?

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

Edit at the top: turns out, any party that is below 5% doesn't make it into the Bundestag, so the multiple leftist parties that fell below that 5% were waisted when it comes to getting seats. The country though still has the majority left leaning vote percentage wise. I'm only keeping the original comment for posterity, some of it is wrong as has been pointed out by the Germans in the thread.

Interestingly, if all the center-left and the leftists parties all added up their percentages of the vote, they get roughly 51.2% of the vote. Now I'm not super knowledgeable on how that affects their Bundestag, but if that means that said 51.2 percent have a majority of seats, they could join together to make a coalition government and keep the far right out of power.

Course that won't happen because us leftists love infighting and refusing to compromise with our fellow leftists for the greater good while the right easily falls in line.

Also interestingly, this could mean that the far right/conservative party is going to be put into power in Germany winning the minority of the vote overall for the second time that I know of. And we all know what happened last time.

Edit: And again, this is all preliminary so it could change and as another commenter mentioned the AfD is a pariah and is still unlikely to be a part of the government due to the conservatives saying they won't be. But who knows, people lie.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Thanks for pointing that out! Fixed it.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I'm sorry, a week ago I was told by CBS and the poster of the article that 53% approved of Trump and called him Energetic and tough. The poster said that we can't deny that the majority of people approve of all that Trump is doing. Now we see that actually his approval is much lower just like I was saying a week ago? That almost all of the approval rating polls show his approval as somewhere in the mid 40s which is significantly less than that CBS poll?

Huh. Maybe CBS was just trying to avoid the 20 Billion dollar lawsuit.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Here's the link to the total Results of the primary election. If Bernie had more Votes he would have won. The facts are that not enough people got out to vote for him. He didn't have anything stolen from him.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was and I voted in the primaries in 2016. But not enough people voted for Bernie for him to win the nomination. He had over 3 and a half million fewer votes than Hilary. And only if all but 9 of the super delegates had went to him he would have gotten the nomination. Which others would have called undemocratic as he didn't win the most votes.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

How is getting the left out to vote in primaries to remake the democratic party doing the same thing? Right now they don't get out and vote in primaries in enough numbers to change anything. Having them get out and vote in primaries en masse WOULD be doing something new.

Edit: you are abolustely right about the propaganda machine. It's why I think there's only two options, finding a way to remake the democratic party, or the country splits.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Their response was to drift right because those voters consistently vote. If the left consistently voted they would be represented in Congress.

And yes I think we can remake it. I think it's our only chance. If the party switch could happen in the 60s, if the Republicans could accelerate into Trumpism in 6 years, then yes we can remake the Democratic party. We. Just. Have. To. Vote. And organize and such.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

45 members out of 7500 is .006%. While that is a tiny amount of success, increasing that to a majority will take decades. The "third parties" in Congress are Independents which is not a formed party like Greens or the PLS like I was talking about. No actual third party has been elected to congress since 1937, according to your very link you provided. Of course I'm not counting Lieberman because his "Third party" was the Connecticut for Lieberman which was literally just for him.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (8 children)

So does that mean overthrowing the government? Does it mean starting a Civil War to establish a new Union? Would it mean the country splitting off into their own grouped together countries? What would a Second American Revolution look like? Because we have an idea of how you can remake the Democratic party. A second American Revolution in modern day needs an image of what it should look like if it is going to work.

For what it's worth, I personally think you either remake the Democratic party, or the country will split.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (10 children)

While I get that, building the infrastructure of a new third party, or increasing an existing third parties infrastructure to the right size, is next to impossible unless you convince every single Democrat voter to move to the next one. That's just not gonna happen. Statistically speaking, third parties will never win. And if you work on building that infrastructure, that will just guarantee Republicans winning until you convince enough people to abandon the Democrats which could take decades.

So then what's the logical next step if those people want to be represented in government? You remake the Democratic party. The Republicans were remade post tea party in 6 years into the Trump party. The Democrats could be remade into an actually consistent and willing to fight far more effectively progressive party in 4 if we just work towards it and vote in the primaries in all elections over the next 4 years. It's far more possible and a far quicker possibility. As long as we have elections going forward, that is, Trump could just cancel them.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

By voting in the primaries. The RNC didn't want Trump, they didn't want all the shit that happened originally. It happened because people voted to put specific Republicans in office during primaries and in the general who helped change their party into the Trump machine it is today.

We can do the same. You reform by actually voting in primaries.

view more: next ›