Pretty sure seeing stars from space is a lot better than what cavemen saw.
Honytawk
joined 1 month ago
So they just imagined it, is that what you are saying?
And this info is based upon what exactly?
And you are never ever 100% certain they did it, even with eye witnesses.
So cutting fingers of innocent people is also a nono
He sucks the Psi out of his tires to elevate his own.
Freetube, the Youtube client has it
Nobody is making those claims. Or they would get sued for false advertising.
People are interpreting as if chatbots are capable of playing chess, but that isn't on the company.
The claims those companies make are real. It are dumb features that are mostly useless, but the claims are not fake.
My 2016 Toyota has only ever been a handful of times in maintenance since I bought it. Still works perfectly in every aspect.
Stop buying shit brands and claiming the old cars that survived up until now are better.
Maybe someone should write a new Art of War to explain to tech CEOs the basic ins and outs of technology development.
- Like you can't throw more developers on a project to make it finish faster.
- Cutting budgets isn't just free money, they come with detriments.
- You can't scamp on security. It can take a single zero day to bankrupt a company.
- There are limits to an internet connection. You can't expect everyone to have gigabit internet.
The basic shit every person working in the field understands. Except for the out-of-touch management. Call it the Art of Commerce or something.
They used to think that, but it is actually not that bad.
Like iterations with machine learning, you can train it with optimized output.
That isn't the dumb part about this.
I believe it won't work.
They would have to change so much info that won't make a coherent whole. So many alternative facts that clash with so many other aspects of life. So asking about any of it would cause errors because of the many conflicts.
Sure it might work for a bit, but it would quickly degrade and will be so much slower than other models since it needs to error correct constantly.
An other thing is that their training data will also be very limited, and they would have to check every single other one thoroughly for "false info". Increasing their manual labour.
Sure, and where is your proof that Bill needs one, let alone uses one?
And don't come with a list of actions the majority of people don't care about.
Only if they are into it