HP_Rubshaft

Honestly at this point I consider those who peddle this narrative either bots or literally worse than those who are captured by the cult of MAGA — because they have "reasoned" that giving MAGA free reign makes them morally superior to those who voted for the Democrats. But I have to ask:

Do you basically just... Not believe in harm reduction?

Because the argument seems to hinge on the idea that you'd refuse to engage in behaviors that reduce TOTAL harm because there would still BE harm.

I agree that none of us are truly free until we all are, but I fail to see how outright christofascism AND genocide are the preferable outcome for you here. How exactly does sending people to El Salvadorian work camps and secreting away protesters improve our foothold on this issue, exactly?

If your idea is that, if gets bad enough, people will have enough anger to fuel your dreams of an uprising of some kind... At the end of the day you're STILL using human suffering as a bargaining chip while patting yourself on the back for being exactly the kind of non-resistance that MAGA relies on to gain power and momentum.

Tl;Dr: I really fucking hope you're an account made for astroturfing and not a real person because "dogshit take" is too soft a descriptor for this line of thinking.

Energy bending

"The worst thing about someone harming others and/or breaking laws is how often I have to hear about it."

"What do you mean I'm only able to say that because I'm not directly affected by it? I'M just trying to go about my day— calling my attitude short sighted is EXACTLY why these bad things are happening"

Holy fuck lol

Sure but as far as the topic at hand goes, I have a hard time imagining a single-nation-centric solution to global climate change.