Oh, wow. I expected someone to correct me and say it will be much sooner due to the size of the two galaxies but didn't think I was that far off.
GreatBlueHeron
Yep - me too. I had to go to our "mainframe room" where we had our only Sun workstation - the only thing that would run the first versions.
So, if my old brain did the math right, it'll get here in about 2.5 billion years?
Oh shit. I'm not a citizen yet, only a PR. Was planning to apply as soon has I reach 3 years. I'll struggle with that. I'm Australian, so I was born with an allegiance to the British monarch, but to actually say it - urgh.
Yep, it's just evil to their own staff. It seems every time I have to call some call centre these days, when I finally get to a human the conversation starts something like "I've just spent 40 fucking minutes trying to get to talk to a person and I'm really pissed off. I know that's not your fault and I apologise in advance if I struggle to contain my frustrations while we talk. Now.."
When you say "applied in the other direction" - I read that as granting, rather than revoking, citizenship. Which doesn't really make sense? I assume you mean an evil government revoking citizenship of good people, rather than this proposal for a good government to revoke the citizenship of an evil person.
It sucks that you're right.
That was my first reaction too. Did you read the text of the petition? What he's doing isn't just politics, he's actively working to erase Canada. There must be some level of anti-Canada behaviour (really bad phrasing, but I can't think of anything better and you know what I mean) that warrants revocation of citizenship?
- Elon Musk has engaged in activities that go against the national interest of Canada;
- He has used his wealth and power to influence our elections;
- He has now become a member of a foreign government that is attempting to erase Canadian sovereignty; and
- The attempts of Elon Musk to attack Canadian sovereignty must be addressed.
Mother and brother for me. There must be so many families torn apart.
Normally, the bonding arrangement should also include a connection to the slab
That makes sense, but I don't have it. My son is an electrician in Australia and he thinks it's a bit strange that I don't have it too.
That the new house is a subordinate structure has a small impact on how the bonding is set up.
No - I'm only sharing water and internet between the buildings. They both have their own feed from the power company.
having 200 ft of conductor means that a distant lightning strike induces a sizable voltage on these wires
I do plan to add surge protectors to both ends. They're so cheap I'd be silly not to.
You may want to re-verify your Ethernet cable using different equipment at the ends
I have tried a few different things, and I think it did connect at 1Gbps once, but didn't stay that way. It did run at 1Gbps when I used it as a fly lead to test it before it was buried. So, unless it was damaged during the back fill, it should work if I can fix the ground issues. The ethernet isn't a big issue for me - it was a bit of an afterthought - a trench was being dug for the water so I bought a cable and dropped it in the trench before it was back filled. I already have a pair of Ubiquiti GigaBeams that work amazingly well - if fixing the ground issues does not fix the ethernet, I'll just keep using the GigaBeams.
It might be the correct deal, but it worries me. I can only imagine the people saying he wants to be a dictator are those that want a Putin style election to install another puppet. I know they have to have elections at some point - it's just a worry!