Fontasia

I have a LinkedIn alert for CTO jobs and for weeks they've been nothing but "founders" wanting someone to build a "next gen crypto trading platform" for no pay

Not sure how long they'll work, but here's the direct link to the audio from the article.

https://public.flourish.studio/uploads/2281856/4a7cec60-ca22-4eb3-9590-80874d2f9b84.wav

https://public.flourish.studio/uploads/2281856/f54efe40-97a4-428f-8019-04edd7451c82.wav

To be fair, he's annoyed at them having missiles, he had no problem selling them as long as he could profit.

After watching some of the footage on Saturday, it's annoying to think "these are the people who will need to pull off a coup?"

If you're willing to look, you can always find a hater

Mentioned here

Link to this issue

I find it really frustrating that supporters of Open Protocols appear to live in cognitive dissonance of both wanting to be "used by everyone" and "to be a small gated community".

You can't keep money out forever and with that does come influence which I know. But eventually wouldn't you like to talk to your mother on a protocol you trust, with a client she understands?

mumbling jong-un gets a golden throne mumbling Not even a hovering one like in Sgt. Bilko

No says the man of !fitgirls@lemmynsfw.com, thighs should never touch, no says the man of !midriffmoe@ani.social stomachs are more sexy, no say the man of !animefeet@lemmynsfw.com heavy breathing

I rejected those answers and demanded my skull be crushed by thicc thighs

Canyon Lookout, Springbrook National Park - view to coast … | Flickr

YOU LIAR!

Meanwhile on Nostr

I know there's people who could articulate it better than I can, but my logic goes like this:

• Loss of critical thinking skill: This doesn't just apply for someone working on a software project that they don't really care about. Lots of coders start in their bedroom with notepad and some curiosity. If copilot interrupts you with mediocre but working code, you never get the chance to learn ways of solving a problem for yourself.
• Style: code spat out by AI is a very specific style, and no amount of prompt modifiers with come up with the type of code someone designing for speed or low memory usage would produce that's nearly impossible to read but solves for a very specific case.
• If everyone is a coder, no one is a coder: If everyone can claim to be a coder on paper, it will be harder to find good coders. Sure, you can make every applicant do FizzBuzz or a basic sort, but that does not give a good opportunity to show you can actually solve a problem. It will discourage people from becoming coders in the first place. A lot of companies can actually get by with vibe coders (at least for a while) and that dries up the market of the sort of junior positions that people need to get better and promoted to better positions.
• When the code breaks, it takes a lot longer to understand and rectify when you don't know how any of it works. When you don't even bother designing or completing a test plan because Cursor developed a plan, which all came back green, pushed it during a convenient downtime and has archived all the old versions in its own internal logical structure that can't be easily undone.

Edits: Minor clarification and grammar.