That's a summary of his thinking overall but not at all what he wrote in the post. What he wrote in the post is that people assume that his theory depends on an assumption (monomaniacal AIs) but he's saying that actually, his assumptions don't rest on that at all. I don't think he's shown his work adequately, however, despite going on and on and fucking on.
Evinceo
joined 2 years ago
Ain't lightcone the ones who funded the effective charity that was a husband, a wife, two employees and a brother in law who fucked an employee, angering the wife? I seem to remember her writing a long tirade about how hot tub meetings and travel photos proved that working conditions at the charity were very good, and there's nothing inappropriate about any of the above.
If they're pedantic enough with FACTS and LOGIC they can rationalize it so they're being oppressed by the normies and not at all responsible for the consequences of their actions.
Aren't prediction markets an attempt to turn insider trading into a productive part of society (or whatever the libertarians who love prediction markets conceptualize as society.)
after party at Curtis Yarvin's house
One sentence horror story.
In fact, didn't they make this movie, "Get Out" right?
Why Do I Hate Pronouns More Than Genocide?
I had to google this but it's real.
Fails to list SlateScott as a controversial guest.
Also, did he just use a bang path to refer to a racist dude's Twitter persona? Seeing old school lore adopted by these mutants gives me heartburn.
Oh, and that bit at the end disclaiming it as an EA event despite it clearly being an EA event is classic "decoupler" (or, if you like, responsibility avoider.)
Does making sure he's transphobic while he's being misogynistic mean this is unfortunately technically inclusive?
Lol said the scorpion, lmao
That's convicted fraudster sam, different sam. Easy mistake, you can usually tell them apart by the hair.
Ah, I think I was confused because Ben Pace was investigating nonlinear under the auspices of Lightcone.