EitherEther

joined 2 years ago
[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

R1 made waves for two reasons:

  1. It was cheap to train (maybe because they stole/"distilled" openAi's training data).
  2. It is much more efficient to run (it requires much less processing power to run at a decent speed).

I think number 2 is what hit the nVidia stock so hard. Up until the R1 release, the future of AI development would require more GPU and more power. The R1 release showed maybe that isn't the case.

Imagine everyone is out driving around in gas powered cars that get 4MPG. Then a new cheaper gas powered car comes out that gets 60MPG. What happens to the price of gas when the 60MPG car is released? Maybe it fluctuates? Maybe it goes down (less gas is needed due to the more efficient cars)? Maybe it goes up as there are more cars on the road (due to the cheaper entry cost)? What happens if the cheaper more efficient car is electric?

Lots of people see the future of AI as being tied to the hardware and have pumped up nVidia's stock because of that. Anything that goes against that theory will likely let some air out of nVidia's bubble.

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lofty Pursuits was a fan too, and they made their own version!

https://www.pd.net/products/tangerine-sours-secret-pre-order

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I bought a gotrax and switched to solid tires (bought the solid tires on amazon).

Getting the new solid tires on was super, super difficult and strenuous. You basically have to pour boiling water on the tires to heat them up and then use dish soap, clamps and pry bars to get the tire on. Very difficult. Probably worth it but still...

Also, side note the gotrax is pretty decent but it wasn't really designed to be taken apart. The bolts for the front wheel (for example) are hidden under a glued reflector on the fork. You basically have to break the plastic to get to the bolts.

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hmm that could be plausible. I wonder if they can reliablely, repeatedly drop bombs/grenades like that?

Additionally I think when they drop individual grenades like that, they have a camera that can pan/point down. The camera visible in the photo seems to be pointing forwards.

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (13 children)

It looks like a bunch of triggers on an FPV drone with a bomb strapped to it. Likely when the drone crashes into something hard (vehicle, building) those wires will touch or somehow trigger the attached explosive to detonate.

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I had the orange!

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

There is an XCom joke in there: 97% to hit... and you missed.

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, agreed. It looks like it could use a bit more squish.

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Did you try putting anything on the surface to assist adhesion? Hairspray? Glue stick?

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

DuckDuckGo seems decent.

[–] EitherEther@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Classic Favorite. Napoleon Dynamite vibes for sure.

view more: next ›