Dupree878

joined 10 months ago
[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Inciting hate isn’t a crime. It’s free speech. He’s not persecuting anyone, just protesting against the religious who want to persecute others by banning people from blasphemy.

If I could I’d have ever parebt who takes a kid to a religious service arrested for child abuse. That’s persecution.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Calling people stupid isn’t persecuting them.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

You choose to believe in your stupid religion. You don’t choose to be a race or sexual orientation so you’re making a false equivalency

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s predictable because the religious are mentally ill and dangerous

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Interesting it won’t let you login or signup using a VPN, even set to the correct country

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I didn’t know this was an ADD thing

But this is so me

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That might convince me to actually vote democrat

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Other people disagree and feel change cannot happen without violence

I said this same thing on another thread regarding why Jan 6 was just a protest and not a violent attack or insurrection or coup and got downvoted to hell.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Depends on the moderator. The can say it’s a “call for violence”

Bunch of pussy bullshit

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He’s just as complacent in the oligarchical society we currently have as anyone.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just something to think about when it comes to the influence social media has on society

TikTok has already transformed how Americans communicate, influencing language and behavior in ways that may have broader implications. The Chinese government, known for using censorship and language control to maintain social order and suppress dissent, leverages euphemistic language as a tool for manipulating public opinion and silencing critical discourse.

Phrases like “unalive” for suicide or “grape” for rape dilute the meaning and impact of language, making it easier for powerful entities to control narratives and obscure uncomfortable truths. This process, known as “language laundering” or “semantic bleaching,” strips words of their emotional weight and original meaning, making it harder to address sensitive or urgent issues effectively.

This trend has extended beyond language to visuals, with people obscuring letters or censoring words in pictures and posts—using terms like “s**cide” or “r*pe.” While this may help users navigate algorithms designed to suppress certain keywords, it completely erodes the clarity and impact of critical conversations.

The normalization of this behavior on TikTok has permeated Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and other social media platforms, spreading a culture of diluted language and indirect communication. These practices hinder meaningful discourse, desensitize users to serious issues, and ultimately make it more challenging to engage with sensitive topics in a direct and effective manner. Recognizing and resisting this shift is essential to preserving the integrity of public discussions and fostering authentic engagement.

view more: next ›