BlueMonday1984

joined 1 year ago
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That opens you up to getting accused of click fraud, as AdNauseam found out the hard way but its worth it if you can squeeze some cash out of them before that happens.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Sentiment analysis surrounding AI suggests sneers are gonna moon pretty soon. Good news for us, since we've been stacking sneers for a while.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago

Recently stumbled upon an anti-AI mutual aid/activism group that's being set up, I suspect some of you will be interested.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

xAI has applied for permits for the first set of turbines. But it won’t install pollution controls unless and until its permits are approved. At that point, xAI will be “the lowest-emitting facility in the country,” allegedly.

Musk probably sees gassing black people as a free bonus for installing the turbines, I strongly doubt he's installing pollution controls.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago

As a famous swindler once said, there's a sucker born every minute.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

New article from Jared White: Sorry, You Don’t Get to Die on That “Vibe Coding” Hill, aimed at sneering the shit out of one of Simon Willson's latest blogposts. Here's a personal highlight of mine:

Generative AI is tied at the hip to fascism (do the research if you don’t believe me), and it pains me to see pointless arguments over what constitutes “vibe coding” overshadow the reality that all genAI usage is anti-craft and anti-humanist and in fact represents an extreme position.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 45 points 1 month ago

Baldur Bjarnason's given his thoughts on Bluesky:

My current theory is that the main difference between open source and closed source when it comes to the adoption of “AI” tools is that open source projects generally have to ship working code, whereas closed source only needs to ship code that runs.

I’ve heard so many examples of closed source projects that get shipped but don’t actually work for the business. And too many examples of broken closed source projects that are replacing legacy code that was both working just fine and genuinely secure. Pure novelty-seeking

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago

Personal rule of thumb: all autoplag is serious until proven satire.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hot take, people will look back on anyone who currently codes, as we look back on the NASA programmers who got the equipment and people to the moon.

I doubt it'll be anything that good for them. By my guess, those who currently code are at risk of suffering some guilt-by-association problems, as the AI bubble paints them as AI bros by proxy.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuuuuuuuuuck. I used to watch that guy.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago

The Repubs more-or-less renamed themselves Team Skynet with this open attempt to maximise AI's harms, I absolutely think they're McFucking Losing It™ right now.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 16 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Breaking news from 404 Media: the Repubs introduced a new bill in an attempt to ban AI from being regulated:

“...no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10 year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act,” says the text of the bill introduced Sunday night by Congressman Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The text of the bill will be considered by the House at the budget reconciliation markup on May 13.

If this goes through, its full speed ahead on slop.

view more: ‹ prev next ›