AverageUlyanovFan

Wrong at every step?

• Socialism doesn't require class abolition, though it's a goal in transition to communism.
• Class abolition doesn't require work abolition, only that everybody belongs to a single class which is based on ownership of MoP, simplified, if everyone works and nobody extracts rent, there is no class distinction.
• Work abolition doesn't require bedtime abolition, there's just straight up no causal relationship, it's possible to have bedtimes with any regular schedule that's not necessarily work.
• Bedtime abolition only requires school reformation so that it is less rigid — I would welcome that but it's an area that needs to be threaded very carefully and experimentations there raise ethical questions I don't have answers to.

Russians always were, are and will be the imperialists.

It's Muscovites there, comrade.

I've made a mistake of opening the watermarked telegram channel. Self-proclaimed "Ukrainian monarchists", and it gets worse. Two posters before this one are Azov propaganda.

I might not be 100% correct but Germany didn't use conscripts that early at war, so those are probably professional soldiers?

A number of Ukrainians I or my acquaintances have contacts with, didn't want or believe there's going to be a war and so did a lot of people around them, though obviously being bombed doesn't make one particularly favorable of the side doing the bombing. This is different from Nazi Germany where Wehrmacht troops have been brainwashed to see Soviet and generally Slavic people like shit to extreme and were on the fucking settler conquest.

I'm not gonna cry over banderlog scum, but a lot of people there have voted for Zelenskyy over Poroshenko because he promised a ceasefire in Donbass and wasn't generally a fucking Ukronationalist (and was "tough on corruption"). He then took a classic huge dump on those who elected him because he has west-oriented capital to serve.

Wonder if those were "professional" military or just unfortunate working class conscripts

It definitely feels like the anti-AES rhetoric has been ramping up over past few decades. Or maybe it's just me growing older and marxister-leninister and I start to notice more of such bs as a result.

I just read that

His regime was marked by a silent terror – he presided over the hunting down of armed opposition members and their eventual murder at the hands of the Ministry of Public Security (UB), including some former members of the Home Army.

And like, wtf is "armed opposition member"? Is that what's called a "violent extremist" today?

Wonder how things will turn when the citizens start seething instead.

You should've said that you aren't promoting violence against people or animals since Nazis don't count as those :)

Somehow also fascists keep getting into anti-communist spaces. Like Poland