Archangel1313

joined 6 days ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

I disagree. Keeping these protest peaceful, is exactly what the Trump administration doesn't want. If they are looking for a justification to escalate the situation, then NOT giving them one, makes it that much harder for them to accomplish their objectives. Every single opportunity to prove them wrong about what they are doing, is a victory. It needs to be demonstrated at every turn.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

At this point, at least they're still using rubber bullets. But, that's the entire plan at the moment...keep shooting non-lethal rounds until someone shoots back.

Then...the safeties come off, and a lot of people die. It all depends on how long the protesters can keep their shit together before someone changes the nature of the conflict.

Right now, most of those soldiers are not going to be ok shooting civilians. But the instant they're getting shot at, there are no civilians anymore. Just targets.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you've already decided that you want a civil war, then Trump doesn't need to find an excuse. You're going to force his hand. And any possibility that those soldiers might be on your side, disappears.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Only if people go into this looking for it.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

If you really believe that, then you must know that attacking them isn't going to get you there. They need to see that what they're doing is wrong. And the only way to do that, is to make sure their orders are unjustified.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (8 children)

That's an Onion article. You can tell because Trump hasn't been shooting protesters for months already. That's what comes next. And that's when it stops being a protest, and turns into a civil war.

Don't be so eager to make that happen.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

No one is saying, "just sit back and let it happen". Only, "Don't do exactly what they want, and call it "resistance"".

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

That's the Insurrection Act. The only way Trump could invoke it, would be if the protesters were armed and attacking the government. That's the entire reason why armed protests are a very bad idea in the US.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -5 points 11 hours ago

Resistance doesn't have to include escalation. Leave that to them...they are going to escalate anyway. If the protesters are the ones doing it, then they just handed Trump exactly what he wants...a legal justification for his actions.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 hours ago (10 children)

This is like saying, "If you're going to be wrongly accused of a crime, you may as well commit it"...just to prove them right?

Not sure how this advice does anything other than give Trump exactly what he wants.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

But, when you say, "they"...you are painting the entire protest as violent, unless you make the distinction that it isn't. And the vast majority of protestors are simply exercising their 1st amendment rights, in a perfectly legal manner.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 34 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

The people setting those fires should absolutely be charged for their actions. But their actions don't negate the Constitutional rights of everyone else who is protesting. And calling in the National guard before the local authorities have declared the situation to be out of their control, is a direct violation of Constitutional law.

view more: next ›