Source: Translating Falasteen via TikTok Genocide
https://x.com/translatingpal/status/1928410150538252310
https://tiktokgenocide.com/uploads/israeli-drone-kills-an-injured-unarmed-palestinian-man
16
University of Michigan using undercover investigators to surveil student Gaza protesters
(www.theguardian.com)
19
What Happened to ‘Hamas Is ISIS & ISIS Is Hamas’? It seems that ISIS is Israel!
(consortiumnews.com)
The plan would raise $20 million from Democratic donors, which the project’s leadership has reportedly already begun to collect, to study the “syntax, language, and content” that’s popular among young men in online spaces, then develop content that spreads an “aspirational vision of manhood that aligns with Democratic values without alienating other core constituencies” and partner with influencers.
These people are fucking aliens.
Hamas’s draft reintroduces terms from a deal that Hamas said it made with Witkoff on May 25. Israel rejected that document and four days later, on May 29, Witkoff and Israel announced new terms, which would permit Israel to resume its genocidal war after 60 days and to keep its forces entrenched deep inside Gaza. It contained no guarantees for allowing the unrestricted flow of food, medicine, fuel and other life essentials to the Gaza Strip.
In a post on X Saturday, soon after he received Hamas’s response, Witkoff denounced Hamas’s draft. “It is totally unacceptable and only takes us backward. Hamas should accept the framework proposal we put forward as the basis for proximity talks, which we can begin immediately this coming week,” Witkoff wrote. “That is the only way we can close a 60-day ceasefire deal in the coming days… and in which we can have at the proximity talks substantive negotiations in good-faith to try to reach a permanent ceasefire.”
Senior Hamas official Basem Naim disputed Witkoff’s characterization. “We did not reject Mr. Witkoff’s proposal. We agreed with him on a proposal, which he deemed acceptable for negotiation. We then received the other party's response (the Israelis) through Mr. Witkoff, which rejected all that we had agreed upon with him,” Naim told Drop Site. “Nevertheless, we responded positively and responsibly, responding to him in a manner that fulfilled the aspirations and demands of our people. Why is the Israeli response considered the only response for negotiation? This violates the integrity and fairness of mediation and constitutes a complete bias towards the other side.”
Rep. Massie's comments should certainly be considered a bare minimum, if that!
"I disagree with your version of Christianity if it requires endorsing the deaths of women and children on the behalf of any country"
He makes no mention of the attack of 200 Zionist counterprotestors with metal bats on completely peaceful demonstrations.
"What we are interested in is not so much the antisemitism of the alt-right or white supremacy platforms but mainstream society, because . . . antisemitism on campuses, antisemitism coming from the left, among artists, it is actually the mainstream, the political moderate discourse that is a challenge in itself. . . . Because as soon as antisemitism is communicated . . . in implicit ways there is very often a lack of sanctioning in contrast for [sic] examples of antisemitic tropes uttered by a neo-Nazi."
I've already explained to you why this is not a religious conflict
https://altmedia.house/post/14101/46172
and you just came back and wrote almost the same comment, in multiple places.
He is not anti-israel for any humanitarian reason, he only cynically uses anti-israel talking points to push antisemitic conspiracy theories.
I disagree. I think he's sincere when he calls killing children evil, and that's good. And I thought his interview with Munther Isaac was very important for breaking conservatives out of the "all Arabs are crazy Muslim and want to kill me" false belief, even if it did focus on the sufferings of the small minority of Palestinian Christians.
I don't agree with everything he's ever said or will say, he may say things I the future I have serious disagreements with. But I think the genocide in Gaza is the most pressing moral issue of our time, and am willing to build a big tent coalition to stop it and hold Israel responsible. I am also a big admirer of Hezbollah, who are very socially conservative, for what it's worth.
It's amazing how much money matters in elections.
Reposting removing explicit X hyperlinks:
Tucker Carlson has called out Ben Shapiro for cheering on the killing of Palestinian civilians, calling it evil, while Piers Morgan defended it (X link: SuppressedNws/status/1885475171667972426)
Tucker has gotten Matt Walsh to implicitly admit that Israel shouldn't exist, because it depends on the US for its existence: (X link: abierkhatib/status/1917775533355720801)
Tucker is a member of the isolationist wing of Republicans trying to prevent war with Iran, and has called out "Mossad agents and warmongers" for derailing the talks: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/trump-allies-say-mossad-agents-and-warmongers-trying-derail-iran-talks
Tucker hosted an interview with Thomas Massie where Massie revealed that every Republican Congressperson has an 'AIPAC babysitter' (X link: HotSpotHotSpot/status/1799169397510311993)
AIPAC is bipartisan, so I can be bipartisan too. I try to seek out and include conservative voices that are critical of Israel, and amplify the isolationist wing of the Republican party that opposes wars in the Middle East. I especially appreciate Tucker calling the killing of Palestinian civilians "evil".
In some ways it's too late. The present moment is not the moment when using the Holocaust to justify occupation, apartheid, and ethnic cleansing became evil. It's been evil for the past 80 years. The present is just when it has become politically untenable.