this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
1083 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

68813 readers
5296 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm happy to see this being noticed more and more. Google wants to destroy the open web, so it's a lot at stake.

Google basically says "Trust us". What a joke.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6xpipe_@lemmy.world 239 points 2 years ago (4 children)

WEI can potentially be used to impose restrictions on unlawful activities on the internet, such as downloading YouTube videos and other content, ad blocking, web scraping, etc.

Not one of those things is illegal.

Some are against a site’s TOS and some are outright fine.

[–] TheHighRoad@lemmy.world 95 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the most disturbing "boring dystopia" thing yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chickenwing@lemmy.world 182 points 2 years ago (24 children)

If you are not using Firefox now is a good time to start.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 70 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just switched yesterday, was way easier than I thought it would be. I'm converted on all my devices, all my stuff has been synced from Chrome in a few clicks. Just do it people.

[–] lemmyvore 37 points 2 years ago

If you haven't already, check out Firefox Sync.

You can sync your stuff across Firefox instances (PC, mobile, different PC profiles etc.) You can choose to sync logins, open tabs, bookmarks, add-ons etc.

Each place you use Firefox can choose to sync different stuff, so for example you can sync logins everywhere but only sync open tabs on the PC.

In case you replace the phone or your PC HDD crashes etc. all you have to do is login back to Firefox Sync and you get all that stuff back.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 30 points 2 years ago

I love Firefox so much. Specially the built in sync. I can browse something on my phone and open it on my computer later and continue where I left off.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 105 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is no defense of the move. It's bad for the internet. Pure and simple!

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"But it'll make us lots of money..."

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 99 points 2 years ago (7 children)

They claim it's to prevent bots, but we all know it'll soon become standard in every WAF out there (Cloudflare, Akamai, etc) to just blanket block browsers failing attestation.

All you need to know what will happen is to root an Android phone. You'd expect Netflix and bank apps and other highly sensitive apps to stop working. Okay, I can accept that, it kind of make sense. But the more you use the phone the more you realize a ton of apps also refuse to work. Zoom complains and marks your session as insecure, the Speedtest app refuses to test your speed, even the fucking weather app won't give you weather anymore. Jira/Confluence/Outlook/Teams also complain about it. It's ridiculous.

Even if it'd trust Google to not misuse the feature and genuinely use it to reduce ad fraud, the problem is the rest of the developers and companies. Those, they absolutely cannot be trusted to not abuse the feature to block everyone. Security "consultants" will start mandating its use to pass security audits, government websites will absolute use it, and before you know it, half the web refuses to work unless you use Chrome, Edge or Safari.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 50 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yup I noticed this also. I used a rooted phone without Google apps on it and so many apps simply refused to work. They use Googles api in the background which means Google finds out about literally everything we do on our phones. They already own the entire operating system but we can't even run apps without them being in the middle.

This is all similar to using Microsoft Windows or Mac OS so I guess people are so used to this behavior that it's somehow ok.

But I'm a long term Linux user and I'm used to the OS not calling home and not reporting what apps I use. And this is how it should be. I'm so over big tech it's not even funny anymore.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I used a rooted phone without Google apps on it and so many apps simply refused to work. They use Googles api in the background

This has nothing to do with being rooted but with Google encouraging people to build apps using its proprietary libraries to make Google Android more valuable than Android Open Source Project. There may be a connection to the EU's attempts to stop Google from forcibly bundling several of its other apps with the Play Store.

For most use cases, good alternatives are available and it's just a matter of developers being lazy, but I'm not sure there's another good option for chat apps to get timely notifications without high battery consumption. MicroG provides an open source alternative to Google's libraries and works for most apps, including chat notifications.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 89 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It won't block browsers that spoof their identity? Yeah, sure.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 45 points 2 years ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] blazera@kbin.social 86 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The fraud-fighting project has fired up quite a controversy

fraud-fighting? Even Google's initial pitch was explicitly describing it as a way to sell more ads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 70 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
[–] Willer@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Dear madam/sir

I dont trust googel. take me seriously.

yours, Willer

[–] blindjezebel@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Dense US citizen here. Eli5 how I should explain "just trust us not to abuse collection of all your data or else get locked out of the world wide web" applies to antitrust laws for the FTC?

I'm genuinely wanting to submit an email complaint/report. I understand that WEI protects nothing, but risks your data with all the sites you visit, all in an effort just to block possibly unprofitable users -- but I'm not sure how to tie in and word the Breaks Antitrust Laws part.

Thank for your time to post these links.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bigredcar@lemmy.world 68 points 2 years ago (6 children)

It's time to use web integrity against them, by blocking access to your site if they "pass" integrity checks, and telling them to use a freedom respecting browser instead.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is actually already implemented, see here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 66 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

There's an ongoing protest against this on GitHub, symbolically modifying the code that would implement this in Chromium. See this lemmy post by the person who had this idea, and this GitHub commit. Feel free to "Review changes" --> "Approve". Around 300 people have joined so far.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Zuberi@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago

Fuck Google 2023

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 54 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm glad the reaction all around seems to be "That's sus as fuck"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago

Google: Do ~~no~~ ALL evil.

[–] Todgerdickinson@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago

*waiting patiently for EU to catch on to this.

Google may not like the outcome…

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It offers web publishers a way to integrate their websites or apps with a code that checks with a trusted party (such as Google)

Imma stop you right there...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingPyrox@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I stopped trusting google when they decided to remove the "Do not be evil" clause

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan@lemm.ee 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, how the hell is this supposed to prevent bots? Unless Google are planning to completely lock the browser down to prevent user scripting and all extensions then surely you can still automate the browser?

[–] ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Unless Google are planning to completely lock the browser down to prevent user scripting and all extensions

Ding ding ding!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SpunkyBarnes@geddit.social 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just like Trickle Down, “Don’t be evil” has aged well and deserves to be repackaged. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemm.ee 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They don't care about a "safe web environment". That is not making them any more money. Knowing much more about their users and being able to perfectly match everything a user does anywhere with Googles advertising business, though, will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antony@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago (5 children)

While you are at it, convince Apple to allow Firefox on iOS, and decline to use WEI in Safari. Otherwise there's no way to avoid WEI on iPhone, and only one mainstream rendering engine free of this insidious malware. Many companies will shy away from it if it breaks mobile apps on the Apple platform.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›