this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
1025 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

20800 readers
1217 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 112 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

And the worst part is when it actually does and you have no fucking idea what went wrong before.

[–] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The pc had the hiccups and now it's fine. Problem solved!

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some times my game engine needs a wake up run, then an actual run.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pantrygheist@programming.dev 105 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's step zero: rule out black magic

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Those damn cosmic rays flipping my bits

Please tell me you look skyward, shake your fist and yell damn you!!!!

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if there's an available OS that parity checks every operation, analogous to what's planned for Quantum computers.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unrelated, but the other day I read that the main computer for core calculation in Fukushima's nuclear plant used to run a very old CPU with 4 cores. All calculations are done in each core, and the result must be exactly the same. If one of them was different, they knew there was a bit flip, and can discard that one calculation for that one core.

load more comments (1 replies)

That feeling when it is, in fact, computer ghosts.

[–] KingBoo@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me: "Hmm... No... No the code is good, it's the compiler that's wrong."

runs again

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 61 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Yeah, but sometimes it works.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's even worse then: that means it's probably a race condition and do you really want to run the risk of having it randomly fail in Production or during an important presentation? Also race conditions generally are way harder to figure out and fix that the more "reliable" kind of bug.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 9 points 1 year ago

Mmm, race conditions, just like mama used to make.

[–] noddy@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Good luck figuring out why it sometimes doesn't work 🙃

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There was that kind of bug in Linux and a person restarted it idk how much (iirc around 2k times) just to debug it.

[–] crushyerbones@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is 100% valid when dealing with code generation sometimes and I hate it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Peafield@programming.dev 45 points 1 year ago

The first is a surprise; the second is testing.

[–] quantenzitrone@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i sometimes do that so i can inspect the error messages on a cleared terminal

[–] winky9827b@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I forget what I was looking for and have to restart the mental loop when doing this.

[–] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of my old programs produces a broken build unless you then compile it again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just had that happen to me today. Setup logging statements and reran the job, and it ran successfully.

[–] TurtleTourParty@midwest.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've had that happen, the logging statements stopped a race condition. After I removed them it came back...

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Thank you for playing Wing Commander!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
======== 37/37 tests passing ========
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

That's when the real debug session begins

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Great time to find out your tests are useless!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Buttons@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago

If that doesn't work, sometimes your computer just needs a rest. Take the rest of the day off and try it again tomorrow.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The crazy thing is that sometimes this just works...

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I often do this, but I always hit Ctrl-S before running it again. Shamefully, this probably works about 10% of the time. Does that technically count as changing nothing?

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

That and a make clean can work wonders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, duh! You need to use the right incantations!

[–] jerrythegenius@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually did this earlier today

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Somehow higher than 0% success rate.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

it's only dumb til it works

[–] attero@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sponsored by QA gang. Gotta make sure it's a 5/5 issue and not just a frequent issue

[–] asg101@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

"Works in my environment."

load more comments
view more: next ›