this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
447 points (99.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8242 readers
433 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Round 1: 200 votes for Jordan

Round 2: 199 votes for Jordan

Round 3: 194 votes for Jordan

Additional detractors this round:

Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA): Jordan round 2, McHenry round 3

Tom Kean Jr. (R-NY): Jordan round 2, McCarthy round 3

Marc Molinaro (R-NY): Jordan round 2, Zeldin round 3

Other GOP changes:

Wesley Hunt (R-TX): Jordan round 2, absent round 3

Derrick Van Orden (R-WI): Jordan round 2, absent round 3

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OpenStars@kbin.social 129 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Aside from the content, I want to take a moment to appreciate how this has such an informative title!:-)

[–] Heratiki@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No doubt. Succinct and accurate with little flair.

[–] TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] kboy101222@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Here, I'll fix it:

Oh no! Jim Jordan loses the Speaker vote for a third time! You won't believe how many hold outs there were!

Followed by 10 paragraphs of SEO ridden, AI generated drivel that buries the answer to the point you give up on finding it

[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Sums up internet articles in 2023, 95% of which could be less than a paragraph, but need to fluff it up to 6 pages to inlay some ads and get those juicy organic clicks

[–] OpenStars@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Tune in at 11 to find out how! ... to access our video on the subject, which points to another webpage, which again links to a video, that again goes to a different story, hey this all seems familiar somehow...? :-P

It's our own damn fault I suppose, for engaging with it and thus not just allowing but outright making/encouraging it to happen.:-(

Not that that excuses them for doing it though:-(.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How will I know how to react if no one gets slammed?

Or destroyed? I like my mundane news ratcheted up to hyperbolic levels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 78 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The idea of Jordan being speaker was one of the stupidest and most offensive ideas they’ve come up with recently, so it’s nice that it isn’t working out.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Lauren Bobert handing beer to colleague Hold this a min.

[–] dmonzel@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

It's not a beer she has in her hands.

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Netflix should buy out the comedy rights for that special. Then people would actually want to pay extra for Netflix.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

The idea of Jordan being speaker was one of the stupidest and most offensive ideas they’ve come up with recently

And that is an incredibly high bar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demonquark@lemmy.ml 68 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I read somewhere that a group of 55 republicans who plan to make sure he gets less votes every round. To rub in how much they don’t want him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are you making fun of the size of my automobile?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, I’m making fun of the size of your voting block.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lol, I'm fuckin Canadian, I live in the UK, I'm not a republican drone. I was riffing off the Simpsons reference...fuck me I guess.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also riffing and having fun here. I’m joking about the chaos, not trying to attack you.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago

Well shit. And here I was, drunk on a train being all fragile. Touché you saucy removed!

I got that reference. Well done

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Everyone needs a speaker. This is the best speaker that I could nominate. Should he therefore be made the subject of fun?

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're doing it on purpose. There was a report a few days ago that outlined a plan to do exactly this. It will continue to get worse for him.

[–] appel@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What I don't get is if we know about this plan, surely gymbo must know as well. So why not just call it quits? Does he like to be humiliated? Is this some sort of fetish for him?

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The goal of to whip, convince, strong arm into submission.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Thus the Disgruntled Henchmen call-center calls to the “nay” voters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Somehow this is until fault of democrats, surely. /s

It's because they won't vote for him, obv.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Those numbers are going in the wrong direction, guy. I think you should bow out. But I hope you’re dumb enough to keep going.

Repubs are the greatest impediment to progress. Dems are the second greatest.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Then again, maybe if he keeps going he will unite everyone behind the banner of "Not Gym Jordan," which is a great service he's able to provide us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 16 points 2 years ago

Gym Jordan feels like what everyone wished Ted Cruz could feel.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If this was 'House of Cards'

Dems would offer Blue state GOPs who voted for Jeffries easy wins in November. The ten or so voted he'd need would be offset by loses in other states.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know if that's a good idea honestly. First, they'd be giving up winnable seats in the future. Second, it'd be Democrats in charge of a republican controlled house. Sure, they could put up things they want for a vote, but stupid people would now think they're responsible for the nothing that gets done. Letting Republicans tear each other apart is probably better politically without major concessions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trustmeitsnotabailou@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If this was house of cards they would be black mailing the reps in the oval office with photos of all their kinks.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

True story. After the 2016 election, there was a panel discussion with the creators of House of Cards, Scandal, The West Wing, and all the other US political TV shows. All the participants said the same thing; if they'd had a character denigrate American POWs the way Trump did in real life, the networks and advertisers would have demanded that the character be treated like a pariah on the show. We're already beyond anything fictional TV could allow.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

"Reality is stranger than what TV advertisers can imagine" is a lot less interesting than "reality is stranger than fiction"

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago
[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Not the way those numbers are trending.

[–] pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Maybe if he tried even MORE death threats? That would probably work...

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Do it again!

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago
[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

genuinely shocked they didn't enthusiastically elect this pedo

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›