this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

European Politics

801 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss European (geo)politics

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

EU parliament accepted a last minute amendment, mandating age verification for pornographic (whatever that is) content online, punishable with up to one year prison sentence.

This was a last minute addition to a directive concerning CSAM. Because adults accessing porn need to be de-anonymised to avoid child exploitation?

Some press releases: (1), (2), (3)

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DavidGarcia 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they are working really hard to weasel their way into total mass surveillance where literally everything you do online is known to the government.

very handy to stamp out dissent if you crimialize free speech and then also force everyone to be deanonymized

they really hate that citizens can just criticize them freely

[–] iii@mander.xyz 17 points 2 days ago

The backhanded way this was last minute added to an unrelated legislation shows that they know what they're doing is both against popular will, and is an evil decision.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In 2023 I was thinking how stupid puritan the Texan politician were. The EU commission and parliament had different ideas.

Turns out the incumbents in EU are very scared as politicians from outside the traditional political families are getting popular votes. And instead of looking into to mirror as to why that is happening, they blame "the internet" and go authoritarian.

Thus joining in the creation of the machinery for mass surveillance and supression.

Currently, only the EU council can still stop this from becoming law. It already passed commission (it's their amendment) and parliament.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The fact that it's happening globally tells me there's more behind this. As you said, only a few short years ago this would seem unthinkable, yet here we are...

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's the next step towards the end of the world wide web.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe deglobalization turns out to be a good thing in the end, it's hard to tell. But it's going to be rough.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's too commercialized. It spreads misinformation, fear, and hate all to make some asshole richer. It keeps our attention at all hours. Our kids are glued to screens and more depressed and lonely than ever.

A smaller decentralized Internet would benefit people, however uncomfortable it might make them at first.

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There won’t be a smaller decentralized internet. The internet isn’t the problem, it’s the services people choose to use and who owns them. There is just as much misinformation on Lemmy as any other network.

Yeah, and it's shitty here too. I'm bored at work.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sadly, this legislation does exactly the opposite: it makes the barrier to entry higher. Restricted to larger groups that can bear the cost of compliance. Ending in a oligopoly, where individuals can't participate unless they use those platforms.