European Politics

801 readers

3 users here now

A community to discuss European (geo)politics

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

qaz@feddit.org

qaz@lemmy.world

Mandatory age verification online in the EU (mander.xyz)

submitted 1 day ago by iii@mander.xyz to c/europepolitics@feddit.org

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

EU parliament accepted a last minute amendment, mandating age verification for pornographic (whatever that is) content online, punishable with up to one year prison sentence.

This was a last minute addition to a directive concerning CSAM. Because adults accessing porn need to be de-anonymised to avoid child exploitation?

Some press releases: (1), (2), (3)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iii@mander.xyz 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In 2023 I was thinking how stupid puritan the Texan politician were. The EU commission and parliament had different ideas.

Turns out the incumbents in EU are very scared as politicians from outside the traditional political families are getting popular votes. And instead of looking into to mirror as to why that is happening, they blame "the internet" and go authoritarian.

Thus joining in the creation of the machinery for mass surveillance and supression.

Currently, only the EU council can still stop this from becoming law. It already passed commission (it's their amendment) and parliament.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fact that it's happening globally tells me there's more behind this. As you said, only a few short years ago this would seem unthinkable, yet here we are...

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's the next step towards the end of the world wide web.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm ok with that

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe deglobalization turns out to be a good thing in the end, it's hard to tell. But it's going to be rough.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why's that?

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's too commercialized. It spreads misinformation, fear, and hate all to make some asshole richer. It keeps our attention at all hours. Our kids are glued to screens and more depressed and lonely than ever.

A smaller decentralized Internet would benefit people, however uncomfortable it might make them at first.

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There won’t be a smaller decentralized internet. The internet isn’t the problem, it’s the services people choose to use and who owns them. There is just as much misinformation on Lemmy as any other network.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, and it's shitty here too. I'm bored at work.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sadly, this legislation does exactly the opposite: it makes the barrier to entry higher. Restricted to larger groups that can bear the cost of compliance. Ending in a oligopoly, where individuals can't participate unless they use those platforms.