I guess it is always better if you are allowed moree freedom to speech, but if advertisers would (not sure) not want to run "ads" on "high profanity" content, then some creator, who just consciously did not use the said profanity in just a few minutes, would have got the ad revenue from those advertisers, but now might not think of it, and falsely believe they can use profanity at all times, but now those advertisers will not run ads on there stuff completely, so they would see a larger drop in the ad revenue to this. kinda seems that to gain freedom of speech, you lose money - 1 step forward, 2 steps back.
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
311 readers
286 users here now
Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
- No paywalled sites at all.
- News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
- No videos.
- Post only direct links.
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
- Al Jazeera.
- NBC.
- CNBC.
- Substack.
- Tom's Hardware.
- ZDNet.
- TechSpot.
- Ars Technica.
- Vox Media outlets, with exception for Axios(Due to being ad free.)
- Engadget.
- TechCrunch.
- Gizmodo.
- Futurism.
- PCWorld.
- ComputerWorld.
- Mashable.
- Hackaday.
- WCCFTECH.
More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.
Encouraged:
- Archive links in the body of the post.
- Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS